Geostationary Satellite: Height, Equator, Uses

  • Thread starter Thread starter ride4life
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravitation
AI Thread Summary
A geostationary satellite must orbit at approximately 35,786 kilometers above the Earth's surface to maintain a fixed position over the equator. This equatorial orbit is necessary to ensure that the satellite's orbital speed matches the Earth's rotation, resulting in a circular path rather than an elliptical one. Geostationary satellites are primarily used for communication, weather monitoring, and surveillance, offering advantages over lower orbit satellites by providing consistent coverage of specific areas. The discussion emphasizes using Newton's laws for calculations rather than relying on Kepler's laws. Overall, geostationary satellites play a crucial role in modern technology and communication systems.
ride4life
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


It is possible to put a satellite into an orbit so that it stays in a fixed position over a point on the Earth's equator (a geostationary or geosynchronous satellite).
a) What would the be height of such a satellite above the Earth's surface?
b) Why must such a satellite orbit above the equator?
c) What are the uses of such a satellite, as compared to lower orbit satellites?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


a) Kepler's Third Law?
b) Fatest Velocity?
c) No Idea :D
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi ride4life! :smile:
ride4life said:
a) What would the be height of such a satellite above the Earth's surface?
b) Why must such a satellite orbit above the equator?
c) What are the uses of such a satellite, as compared to lower orbit satellites?

a) Kepler's Third Law?
b) Fatest Velocity?
c) No Idea :D

Forget Kepler (this is the second time, isn't it?) … there's hardly any exam questions on Kepler :wink:

a) use Newton's second law and Newton's law of gravitation (remember, you want T = 24*3600)

b) what shape would the orbit be if it wasn't on the equator?

c) google or wiki for "geostationary" :smile:
 
a) i used kepler's third law with
r=h+6.4x106, with h being the distance from the Earth's surface to the satellite
and
T=86400s
ended getting 3.59x108m
b) orbit above the equator would be a circle, elsewhere it would be an ellipse?
c) geostationary satellites move at the same speed as the earth, allowing transmitters to maintain links for periods of time, such as radio
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top