Get a Recommendation on Hatfield's Book:The Quantum Field Theory

  • Thread starter Thread starter dextercioby
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book
AI Thread Summary
"The Quantum Field Theory of Point Particles and Strings" by Hatfield is recommended as a solid introduction to field theory, particularly for those familiar with mathematical methods but lacking in physical specifics. The book provides extensive motivation for concepts like Fadeev-Popov quantization of gauge theory. However, readers have noted that its section on string theory is somewhat limited. It serves as a complementary primer to Zee's text, catering to different learning needs. While it is beneficial for foundational understanding, many have transitioned to more application-focused texts like Peskin & Schroeder afterward. The discussion emphasizes the importance of clear mathematical presentation in the study of these advanced topics.
dextercioby
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
13,390
Reaction score
4,046
I accidentally came across this title:"The Quantum Field Theory of Point Particles and Strings",by some guy Hatfield.

Anyone care to give me a reccomandation,a comment,before i jump and spend some money...?

Daniel.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is a fine introduction to field theory for people who are sophisticated about mathematical methods but untrained in physical specifics. It spends oodles of time motivating such things as Fadeev-Popov quantization of gauge theory and leading you through it. Most readers have found the section on string theory too limited. As a kind of primer, it is sort of orthogonal to that other primer, Zee's text. They address different students with different needs.

I was high on it and derived a lot of benefit from it, but I moved on afterward to more standard texts, notably Peskin & Schroeder.
 
So you're saying it's more mathematical and less inclined towards applications than Peskin & Schroeder (maybe Itzykson & Zuber,too) and goes along with Zee's text.

Okay,thank you.Excellent,then.I hate when maths is sloppily presented.


Daniel.
 
TL;DR Summary: Book after Sakurai Modern Quantum Physics I am doing a comprehensive reading of sakurai and I have solved every problem from chapters I finished on my own, I will finish the book within 2 weeks and I want to delve into qft and other particle physics related topics, not from summaries but comprehensive books, I will start a graduate program related to cern in 3 months, I alreadily knew some qft but now I want to do it, hence do a good book with good problems in it first...
TLDR: is Blennow "Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering" a good follow-up to Altland "Mathematics for physicists"? Hello everybody, returning to physics after 30-something years, I felt the need to brush up my maths first. It took me 6 months and I'm currently more than half way through the Altland "Mathematics for physicists" book, covering the math for undergraduate studies at the right level of sophystication, most of which I howewer already knew (being an aerospace engineer)...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
641
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Back
Top