Getting Back Into Physics: Struggling to Understand Electromagnetism

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the challenges of understanding the wave equation in electromagnetism after a five-year break from physics studies. The wave equation's components, including amplitude, wave number, angular frequency, and phase angle, are explained, emphasizing their roles in describing wave behavior. The participant expresses a need to grasp these concepts quickly due to an upcoming exam and acknowledges the importance of visualizing the wave properties. They plan to seek additional resources, such as web applets, to aid their understanding. Overall, the conversation highlights the struggle to reconnect with complex physics concepts and the importance of visualization in learning.
disknoir
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
I have come back to studying physics after 5 years and I'm doing a course in electromagnetism.

I've come to the wave equation and I'm a little rusty.

For example, the general solution,

A(z,t) = Acos(2*pi*z/L - 2*pi*f*t + phi)

I know basically what the terms mean, but I'm unsure how they work together to form the wave, and can't seem to form an intuitive picture in my head.

My exam is in 3 weeks, do I need to figure this out quickly. I find it near impossible to move on if I don't understand something like this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the last paragraph, it should be "so" not "do" :)
 
A is the amplitude of the wave. Basically meaning the maximum values that the wave can reach.

2*pi/L is the wave number, k, where L is the wavelength. This takes your position and tells you where you are on the wave

2*pi*f is the angular frequency, omega, where f is the frequency. This takes your time and tells you where you are on the wave.

Phi is the phase angle. This tells you if your wave has been shifted at all. A phase angle of 0, 2pi, 4pi, etc will give you constructive interference between waves and a phase angle of pi, 3pi/2, etc will give you destructive interference

Notice how the units of z and L cancel out, as do the units of f and t

I hope that these make sense. And note that I'm still studying in undergrad so these might not be all right or accurate to the degree you were hoping for
 
Hey, thanks for replying.

I understand what you said, and this is basically what it says in my textbook.

I'm going to go away and have a think about this while I'm at work tomorrow. I'll also try and find some kind of web applet to help me visualise it.

I'll post it on here if I find a good one.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top