Getting Inside A Microcontroller

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lancelot59
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Microcontroller
AI Thread Summary
To access the die of a dead microcontroller, alternatives to using industrial acids include burning off the plastic casing with a small torch while avoiding overheating the chip, followed by rinsing with nail polish remover and vinegar. Hydrofluoric acid is recommended for etching, as temperature affects the etch rate, but safety precautions are crucial. The discussion emphasizes that reverse engineering requires specific knowledge and tools, which the original poster acknowledges they lack. The intent is simply to observe the die rather than conduct a full reverse engineering process. Overall, the conversation highlights the challenges and methods involved in accessing microcontroller internals.
Lancelot59
Messages
640
Reaction score
1
I have a microcontroller here that's dead. I want to get inside it and look at the actual die. Last time I tried this I used a sander, and it scratched it quite badly. I know there is the industry method of dumping hot acid on the device, but I don't have the equipment to do that safely.

I don't really care about being able to use the device afterwards. Are there any other ways I can get inside the device?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You can burn off the plastic with a small torch but make sure the chip does not glow more than red hot.

After that, rinse it alternating between nail polish remover and vinegar. Repeat and burn/rinse again if necessary. I'm not promising success, but it beats using industrial acids.
 
Lancelot59,

Reverse Engineering an embedded uC is an art. You get no credit for failing to have the brushes. The only possible information you can gleen from a "dead" uC is the ROM or if you are much smarter than your post suggests (and clueless on what you are reverse engineering), the architecture of the uC (which, if as stated, you have done your homework on was known going in). So, what is your real question, LOL. BTW, you do not need "hot acid", you need hydrofluoric acid, the temperature simply determines the etch rate (assuming you have made it past the epoxy layer).

If you really want to explore reverse engineering this is NOT the proper forum ;-) But I am just an idiot! Throw some acetone at the die and wait for something to happen ;-)

Fish
 
Fish4Fun said:
Lancelot59,

Reverse Engineering an embedded uC is an art. You get no credit for failing to have the brushes. The only possible information you can gleen from a "dead" uC is the ROM or if you are much smarter than your post suggests (and clueless on what you are reverse engineering), the architecture of the uC (which, if as stated, you have done your homework on was known going in). So, what is your real question, LOL. BTW, you do not need "hot acid", you need hydrofluoric acid, the temperature simply determines the etch rate (assuming you have made it past the epoxy layer).

If you really want to explore reverse engineering this is NOT the proper forum ;-) But I am just an idiot! Throw some acetone at the die and wait for something to happen ;-)

Fish
I know I don't have the tools or knowledge for reverse engineering, that's not what I'm planning to do. I just want to get at the die and look at it. From what I heard the standard method was squirting hot sulphuric acid onto the device, so that's where I got "hot acid' from.
 
Hey guys. I have a question related to electricity and alternating current. Say an alien fictional society developed electricity, and settled on a standard like 73V AC current at 46 Hz. How would appliances be designed, and what impact would the lower frequency and voltage have on transformers, wiring, TVs, computers, LEDs, motors, and heating, assuming the laws of physics and technology are the same as on Earth?
While I was rolling out a shielded cable, a though came to my mind - what happens to the current flow in the cable if there came a short between the wire and the shield in both ends of the cable? For simplicity, lets assume a 1-wire copper wire wrapped in an aluminum shield. The wire and the shield has the same cross section area. There are insulating material between them, and in both ends there is a short between them. My first thought, the total resistance of the cable would be reduced...
I used to be an HVAC technician. One time I had a service call in which there was no power to the thermostat. The thermostat did not have power because the fuse in the air handler was blown. The fuse in the air handler was blown because there was a low voltage short. The rubber coating on one of the thermostat wires was chewed off by a rodent. The exposed metal in the thermostat wire was touching the metal cabinet of the air handler. This was a low voltage short. This low voltage...

Similar threads

Back
Top