Gibbs Free Energy Change/Entropy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around understanding the relationship between Gibbs free energy and the spontaneity of chemical reactions, particularly in the context of the second law of thermodynamics. It is established that a negative Gibbs free energy change (ΔG < 0) indicates that a reaction is spontaneous. The user seeks clarification on a seminar question regarding how the second law relates to Gibbs free energy and the spontaneity of reactions. Key points include the understanding that while a reaction can be spontaneous with a positive Gibbs free energy under certain conditions, specifically if the enthalpy change (ΔH) is significantly large and the temperature (T) and entropy change (ΔS) are small, this is not applicable at constant temperature and pressure. At these conditions, a positive ΔG means the reaction will not proceed spontaneously. The discussion emphasizes the importance of entropy in determining the spontaneity of processes and reinforces the foundational concepts of thermodynamics in physical chemistry.
sidnake
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi, seen as it's Physical Chemistry I am asking about and Physical Chemistry is essentially applied Physics I figured that it would be okay to ask here. I have an exam this tuesday, and my lecturer went over some seminar questions. He provided answers to the calculations but did not provide answers to the worded questions, and I'm getting a bit confused on this one.

As I understand so far, as a reaction proceeds if the Gibbs free Energy change decreases then the reaction is spontaenous.
ΔrGθprodfGθreactfGθ
So if the products had a Gibbs Free Energy that was lower than the reactants Gibbs Free Energy then the Standard Gibbs energy of the reaction ΔrGθ would be a negative number. Indicating the reaction proceeded in the forward direction.

In my seminar however we were asked the following question,
"What is the second law of thermodynamics? By considering changes in both the system of
interest and the surroundings, explain how this law leads to the fact that the Gibbs free energy change for a reaction is negative when the reaction is likely to proceed. "
I've been looking in my textbook, but to be honest I'm a bit confused.

Could someone help me in understanding this question, and maybe providing a model answer so I can understand this concept for my exam on tuesday. Even if this is unlikely to come up because it is on the seminar, I feel it would be unwise to proceed to the next year not understanding this. Especially as physical chemistry is my weak spot.

Thanks Alex
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Thankyou very much for replying, I'm new to this forum and totally overlooked searching for previously asked questions. Thankyou for responding in a kind manner.

I think I understand the concept now, am I right in thinking that you could have a reaction that proceeded spontaenously even with a positive Gibbs Free energy, if Delta H was very large, and T and Delta S very small?
 
sidnake said:
Thankyou very much for replying, I'm new to this forum and totally overlooked searching for previously asked questions. Thankyou for responding in a kind manner.

I think I understand the concept now, am I right in thinking that you could have a reaction that proceeded spontaenously even with a positive Gibbs Free energy, if Delta H was very large, and T and Delta S very small?
If the reaction is at constant T and P, no, a reaction can not proceed if deltaG is positive. Entropy is effectively the definition of a process being spontaneous or not and thermodynamic free energies are different ways to dress up the second law in terms of system variables. If deltaG is positive, at constant T and P, then the reaction will not proceed spontaneously.

If deltaH is very large, TdeltaS must be even larger to compensate and vice versa.
 
Last edited:
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top