Given a canonical transformation, how does one find its type?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the type of a given canonical transformation without needing to find a generator explicitly. It suggests that one can analyze the transformation by attempting to express the coordinates in terms of a specific set, rather than starting from Hamilton's principle. A proposed approach involves testing various coordinate sets to see if they allow for a valid generating function. The transformation's complexity is highlighted, indicating that some coordinate combinations may not yield a suitable generating function. Ultimately, exploring different coordinate sets is essential for classifying the transformation type effectively.
mjordan2nd
Messages
173
Reaction score
1
I'm given the following transformation

X=x \cos \alpha - \frac{p_y}{\beta} \sin \alpha
Y=y \cos \alpha - \frac{p_x}{\beta} \sin \alpha
P_X=\beta y \sin \alpha + p_x \cos \alpha
P_Y=\beta x \sin \alpha + p_y \cos \alpha

and I'm asked to find what type(s) of transformation it is. I'm not sure how to go about doing this without being given a generator. Do I basically try and find a generator? If so, how do I do this. Do I start from Hamilton's principle and try the definition of each type of generator?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do I basically try and find a generator?

Not quite, that is a lot more work. You don't have to actually find the generator to determine what type it should be.

If so, how do I do this. Do I start from Hamilton's principle and try the definition of each type of generator?

Say, for the sake of argument, the generator F is a function of p_x,y,X,Y (it's not) so that F=F(p_x,y,X,Y). This means that you would be able to write the other coordinates (namely p_y,x,P_x,P_y) in terms of these ones. I can see that this type of generating function won't work since when I try to write P_y I find (you'll need to invert the transformation to see this):
<br /> P_y = x\beta \sin\alpha + p_y\cos\alpha = \left(X\cos\alpha + \frac{\sin\alpha}{\beta}P_y\right) \beta\sin\alpha + p_y\cos\alpha<br />
and that simplifies to P_y=X\beta\tan\alpha + p_y\sec\alpha. Therefore, I cannot write P_y as a function of only those chosen coordinates. Try something else and see if you can find a coordinate set that works---then you will know what type of generating function you can have.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Hello! I am generating electrons from a 3D gaussian source. The electrons all have the same energy, but the direction is isotropic. The electron source is in between 2 plates that act as a capacitor, and one of them acts as a time of flight (tof) detector. I know the voltage on the plates very well, and I want to extract the center of the gaussian distribution (in one direction only), by measuring the tof of many electrons. So the uncertainty on the position is given by the tof uncertainty...
Back
Top