Given a Hamiltonian how do you pick the most convenient Hilbert space?

golnat
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
For example, I have a 3D particle that experiences a harmonic oscillator potential only in the X,Y plane for all Z ie. a free particle in the Z direction. This seems like cylindrical coordinates but I'm not sure how to express the Hilbert space if I want to be able to describe states and eigenvalues.

H = (Px^2 + Py^2 + Pz^2) / (2m) + 1/2*mω^2(x^2+y^2)

I know that the energies will be characterized by the two harmonic oscillator dimension quantum numbers and also by the momentum in the z-direction, but what is the formal way to describe the Hilbert space?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In ordinary QM (as opposed to QFT) all Hilbert spaces are equivalent, so you don't have to care.
Maybe you mean the range of definition?
 
I'm studying for my preliminary exam for grad school, and I have a practice problem that gives this Hamiltonian. The first part asks about the symmetries of the hamiltonian. I said energy, angular momentum about the z-axis and linear momentum in the z-direction. The next part asks, "Describe the most convenient Hilbert space to use for describing states and eigenvalues of this system, and describe why."
 
Technically the existing symmetries (such as space-time ones) would help you get a suitable Hilbert space starting from L^(R^n), n = dof. For the uniparticle Hamiltonian in post #1, the Hilbert space would be L^2((0,r),dr) X {e^(im\phi) | m in Z} X L^2 (R,dz).
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top