Given an algebraic alpha be of degree n over F, show at most. .

  • Thread starter Thread starter barbiemathgurl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Alpha Degree
barbiemathgurl
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
let alpha be algebraic over F of degree n, show that there exists at most n isomorphisms mapping F(alpha) onto a subfield of bar F (this means the algebraic closure).

thanx
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let phi be one of the isomorphisms, and apply phi to the minimal polynomial for alpha. This should give you a condition on phi(alpha).
 
barbiemathgurl said:
let alpha be algebraic over F of degree n, show that there exists at most n isomorphisms mapping F(alpha) onto a subfield of bar F (this means the algebraic closure).

thanx
Please, reread your questions. This is not the first time you made an error. I was lucky to understand what you asked.

I presume you want to show there are at most n isomorphisms mapping F(a) onto a subfield of bar(F) leaving F fixed.

If \phi:F(a) \mapsto E is an isomorphism for E\leq \bar F then a\mapsto b where a\mbox{ and }b are conjugates. Conversely, if a\mapsto b and their are conjugates then by the Conjugation Isomorphism Theorem there is exactly one such isomorphism leaving F fixed. Let the irreducible monic polynomial for a be c_0+c_1x+...+c_nx^n then there are at most n zeros, and hence at most n conjugate elements.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
Back
Top