Is Infinity Divided by Infinity Equal to 1?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Einstein's Cat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Infinity Value
AI Thread Summary
Infinity divided by infinity is not equal to 1; it is an indeterminate form that can yield various results depending on the context of limits in calculus. Division by infinity is not defined, similar to how division by zero is undefined. When examining limits, expressions involving infinity can result in any number, including zero or infinity itself. The limit process is essential to determine the value of such expressions, as they cannot be treated as constants. Therefore, without applying limits, the concept of dividing infinity by infinity lacks meaning.
Einstein's Cat
Messages
182
Reaction score
2
Is infinity divided by infinity equal to 1? 6 divided by 6 is equal to 1 however as infinity resembles 0 in the sense that 0 dived by 0 is equal to 0, I am uncertain whether infinity divided by infinity would equal 1 or instead, infinity.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Usually you can't do things like multiply or divide by infinity. It is not defined. Similarly, 0 divided by 0 is not 0. It is not defined.

What you can sometimes do is examine a limit. So ##\lim_{x->0} \frac{\sin(x)}{x}## is defined, and is 1. So in this sense, in this case, dividing a zero by a zero gives you 1. But only as the limit.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L'Hôpital's_rule
 
The uncertainties of the type ##\infty \cdot 0##, ##\infty/\infty## or ##0/0## acquire a definite value only as a limit, you can't simply operate with ##\infty## as being a number. So, unless we can go through the limit process it makes no sense to say that some uncertainty is equal to some value.
 
You are considering infinity as a constant number
Depends on the infinities you are working with quotient of two infinities can be zero or infinity too
 
Cheers for all your help
 
Einstein's Cat said:
Is infinity divided by infinity equal to 1? 6 divided by 6 is equal to 1 however as infinity resembles 0 in the sense that 0 dived by 0 is equal to 0, I am uncertain whether infinity divided by infinity would equal 1 or instead, infinity.
You have managed to pack a number of things that aren't true into a small number of words.

Is infinity divided by infinity equal to 1?
No.
The indeterminate form ##[\frac{\infty}{\infty}]## shows up in calculus as limits that can literally come out to any number, as well as negative or positive infinity. Here are some simple examples:
1. ##\lim_{x \to \infty}\frac{x^2}{x} = \infty##
2. ##\lim_{x \to \infty}\frac{x}{x^3} = 0##
3. ##\lim_{x \to \infty}\frac{x^2 + 3}{3x^2 - x + 7} = \frac 1 3##

as infinity resembles 0
No, not at all.

0 dived divided by 0 is equal to 0
No.
Division by 0 is not defined. The indeterminate form ##[\frac 0 0]## also shows up in calculus limits, and can come out to any number. Some examples of this:
1. ##\lim_{x \to 0}\frac{x^2}{x} = 0##
2. ##\lim_{x \to 0}\frac{x}{x^2}## does not exist
3. ##\lim_{x \to 0}\frac{x}{x^3} = \infty##
4. ##\lim_{x \to 0}\frac{\sin(2x)}{x} = 2##
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
40
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top