Glancing Collisions In 2D, help simplifying

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a physics problem involving a glancing collision in 2D, where a mass m1 collides with a stationary mass 2m. The goal is to calculate the velocities V1 and V2 after the collision, given that both masses move off at 45 degrees. Participants clarify the application of momentum conservation equations in both x and y directions, correcting initial attempts at these equations. The correct equations involve the total initial momentum equating to the total final momentum for both axes. One participant successfully simplified the problem and achieved a high score on their assignment.
Visionary_
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


We are only given variables in this problem, that is:
m1 travels at V, collides with 2m which is at rest
results in m going off at 45° at V1
2m also goes off at 45° down at V2
Calculate V1 and V2 in terms of V


Homework Equations


Ʃρx-initial=Ʃρx-final
Ʃρy-initial=Ʃρy-final
Use Linear combinations; sin45= √2/2=cos45

The Attempt at a Solution


x direction:
mv1=mv1√2/2+2mv√2/2
y direction
0=√2/2(mv1+2mv)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Visionary_ said:

Homework Statement


We are only given variables in this problem, that is:
m1 travels at V, collides with 2m which is at rest
results in m going off at 45° at V1
2m also goes off at 45° down at V2
Calculate V1 and V2 in terms of V


Homework Equations


Ʃρx-initial=Ʃρx-final
Ʃρy-initial=Ʃρy-final
Use Linear combinations; sin45= √2/2=cos45

The Attempt at a Solution


x direction:
mv1=mv1√2/2+2mv√2/2
y direction
0=√2/2(mv1+2mv)

The equations you have written out are not quite right.

You have:

x direction:
mv1=mv1√2/2+2mv√2/2
y direction
0=√2/2(mv1+2mv)

but were perhaps trying for

x direction:
m1V=m1V1√2/2+m2V2√2/2
y direction
0=√2/2(m1V1+m2V2)

Though perhaps you really did mean masses m and 2m ?
 
yes the second mass was 2m as in twice the mass,
i simplified the problem further and got a 90% on the paper so its fine :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Back
Top