Global Warming: What Happens to Day Length if South Pole Melts?

AI Thread Summary
If the South polar ice cap melts completely due to global warming, it may lead to a slight increase in the length of the day due to changes in the Earth's moment of inertia. The melting ice redistributes mass from the pole, potentially slowing the Earth's rotation. However, the overall impact on day length is considered negligible and likely too insignificant to measure. The length of the year remains unchanged since it depends on Earth's orbit around the sun, not its rotation. Thus, while theoretical discussions suggest a longer day, the practical effects of melting ice caps on Earth's rotation are minimal.
hy23
Messages
60
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I swear this is the weirdest question I've encountered: If the South polar ice cap melts completely due to global warming, then what do you expect to happen to the length of the day?


2.Choices
a. It will get slightly longer
b. It will get slightly shorter
c. It will not change, but the year will slightly change length
d. It will only change if the North polar ice also melts
e. there will be no change at all
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hy23 said:

Homework Statement


I swear this is the weirdest question I've encountered: If the South polar ice cap melts completely due to global warming, then what do you expect to happen to the length of the day?


2.Choices
a. It will get slightly longer
b. It will get slightly shorter
c. It will not change, but the year will slightly change length
d. It will only change if the North polar ice also melts
e. there will be no change at all

You should know by now that you are required to show your own work before we can offer tutorial help.

What do you think are the best choices, and why? If the polar cap melts, what happens to the mass and its distribution? What effect(s) would that have?
 
a. It will get slightly longer
b. It will get slightly shorter
c. It will not change, but the year will slightly change length
d. It will only change if the North polar ice also melts
e. there will be no change at all

Sure. Well here's my analysis. The length of the year depends on how fast the Earth revolves around the sun, even after the ice cap melts, the mass of the Earth should remain unchanged and so Earth's revolution should remain unchanged, so c is probably wrong. The length of the day is dependent on how fast the Earth rotates on its axis, the south ice cap is enormous, originally all the mass of the ice is at the south pole, melting leads to this mass being distributed across the earth, so the moment of inertia of the Earth may increase, leading to slower rotation and a slightly longer day?

That's my best guess.
 
hy23 said:
a. It will get slightly longer
b. It will get slightly shorter
c. It will not change, but the year will slightly change length
d. It will only change if the North polar ice also melts
e. there will be no change at all

Sure. Well here's my analysis. The length of the year depends on how fast the Earth revolves around the sun, even after the ice cap melts, the mass of the Earth should remain unchanged and so Earth's revolution should remain unchanged, so c is probably wrong. The length of the day is dependent on how fast the Earth rotates on its axis, the south ice cap is enormous, originally all the mass of the ice is at the south pole, melting leads to this mass being distributed across the earth, so the moment of inertia of the Earth may increase, leading to slower rotation and a slightly longer day?

That's my best guess.

That would be my take on the question as well. Good reasoning. Do you know if it's right?
 
actually I don't know if it's right.

more importantly though, I think this question is probably exaggerated to emphasize the physical concepts of rotation and gravitation...but realistically, the melting of ice caps will not affect (or is too insignificant to affect) the rotation of the Earth right?
 
hy23 said:
actually I don't know if it's right.

more importantly though, I think this question is probably exaggerated to emphasize the physical concepts of rotation and gravitation...but realistically, the melting of ice caps will not affect (or is too insignificant to affect) the rotation of the Earth right?

Agreed. Very insignificant.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top