Goldstein Central Force Repulsive Scattering

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a specific point in Goldstein's mechanics textbook regarding the relationship between the angles ##\psi## and ##\theta## in the context of central force repulsive scattering. It highlights a potential confusion where the angle ##\theta##, derived from the orbit equation, is stated to be ##\psi## but is also expressed as ##\psi = \pi - \theta##. Participants clarify that starting from an angle of ##\pi## and tracing to ##r = r_m## results in an angle of ##\pi - \psi##, indicating a misunderstanding in the interpretation of the angles. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly applying the limits and understanding the geometric representation in the diagram. Overall, the conversation seeks to resolve the apparent contradiction in the angle definitions presented in the text.
decerto
Messages
84
Reaction score
2
On page 108 in Goldstein 3rd edition in the paragraph after equation (3.94) he says that ##\psi##` can be obtained from the orbit equation (3.36) using the limits as ##r_0=\infty## ##r=r_m## which the distance of closest approach and ##\theta_0=\pi## which is the initial direction.

So looking at the diagram on the top of the page this angle he is calculating ##\theta## seems to me to be exactly ##\psi## but he says that ##\psi=\pi-\theta##

When we start at ##r=\infty , \theta = \pi## and move to ##r=r_m## on the diagram the corresponding angle traced out is ##\theta=\psi## where am I going wrong/The book is here for anyone who doesn't have it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Science news on Phys.org
decerto said:
When we start at r=∞,θ=πr=\infty , \theta = \pi and move to r=rmr=r_m on the diagram the corresponding angle traced out is θ=ψ\theta=\psi where am I going wrong/
You start out at an angle of ##\pi## and trace out an angle ##\psi## so you must end up at an angle ##\pi-\psi##.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top