Good book on particle dynamics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a B.Sc. second-year student in India pursuing a specialization in Mathematical Physics, seeking recommendations for a book on particle dynamics that balances mathematical rigor with physical explanation. The student notes a lack of core physics training in their college curriculum, which focuses more on pure mathematics. Recommendations include Griffiths, although it is clarified that it does not cover mechanics. Arnold's book is suggested as an excellent resource, praised for its rigorous presentation of classical mechanics and its mathematical foundations, though it may not provide extensive physical insights. The emphasis is on finding a text that effectively bridges the gap between mathematics and physics.
ShakilasSalafi
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I am a B.Sc. 2nd year student of Maths (Honours-equivalent to an US Maths Major), Physics and Computer Science(Probably equivalent to US Physics minor and CS minor) in a college in India. I hope to become a specialist in Mathematical Physics later on. Since my background knowledge of core physics isn't much and my college curriculum is more suitable for training pure mathematicians(topologists, algebraists etc.), it is not possible for me to learn much physics from my college curriculum. Can anybody please suggest me a good book on particle dynamics, particularly one where there are the flavours of both mathematical rigour as well as physical explanation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
[strike]Do you want a western book? The Marion & Heald one looks really good, but I think it'll be too expensive for you, so try Griffiths instead.[/strike]

Sorry, I misunderstood the question.
 
Last edited:
verty said:
Do you want a western book? The Marion & Heald one looks really good, but I think it'll be too expensive for you, so try Griffiths instead.

Griffiths isn't a book on mechanics.

@OP: I would suggest getting Arnold: https://www.amazon.com/dp/0387968903/?tag=pfamazon01-20

It does exactly what it's title describes. It presents the mathematical structure of classical mechanics in a rigorous fashion. You won't learn much physics from it as far as actual physics goes but you certainly will learn about the relation between the physics of classical mechanics and the mathematical structures it uses. You honestly won't find a better book on the abstraction of classical mechanics that develops the subject using rigorous mathematics. Arnold's book is deservedly of legendary status.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Back
Top