Good Physicist and Mathematical Problem Solving.

AI Thread Summary
Struggling to solve every problem in physics can lead to frustration, especially for those aspiring to excel in the field. It's important to recognize that not being able to solve all problems is acceptable; aiming to solve around 90% is a more realistic goal. Developing problem-solving skills takes time and practice, and initial difficulties often stem from unfamiliarity with the material. Some problems may also be poorly worded or overly complex. Instead of fixating on every problem, it's advisable to focus on honing skills in various subjects and seek help for particularly challenging problems. With continued effort, many students find that their abilities improve significantly over time.
Peon666
Messages
107
Reaction score
0
I have this problem that if I'm not able to solve each and every, or almost all, of the problems at the back of each chapter, I get extremely frustrated and start thinking that I can't really make a good physicist since a good physicist should be able to solve any kind of problem related to physics.

Is it OK if I can't solve some of them? Or do I have to practice constantly until and unless I develop the ability to solve all of em? BTW, I'm an undergraduate Electrical Engineering student, though I intened to do my masters in theoretical Physics.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, you don't need to be able to do each and every one. Still, I don't want to disuade you not to try hard on the difficult problems because this is what really gets your brain working. I'd say be able to do about 90% of them, and get help for the ones that troubled you. It seems problem solving is a skill that sort of grows on you. By the end of the year, you more than likely will be able to solve all of them and wonder what held you back at the beggining. What holds one back is that they are being exposed to the material for the first time and still don't see all the connections. This comes with practice. Also, some problems are just worded poorly and/or are too imaginative. Don't waste insane amounts of time on a compulsion to do them all when that time can be devoted to honing other skills in other subjects. Then, if free time permits, obsess all you want.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top