Can a Good Researcher Be a Bad Student?

  • Thread starter Thread starter missfangula
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Student
AI Thread Summary
Thriving in a research environment often requires different skills than excelling as a student, as independent thinking and project organization are crucial for success. While some individuals may be strong researchers but struggle with coursework, they still need to demonstrate a reasonable level of academic proficiency to pass qualifying exams in graduate school. Conversely, high-performing students may falter when faced with independent research tasks. A balance of skills in both areas is essential for long-term success in academia. Ultimately, both research and coursework abilities contribute to a graduate's overall capability.
missfangula
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Is this possible? I find myself thriving in the research environment, but I would not call myself a very good student...are there different skills involved, from your experience? Has this happened to anyone else?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What I've found is that the best students don't always make the best researchers because of exactly what you've mentioned: there are different skills involved. There are a lot of people who become very good at being a students - who solve any problem set you can come up with and write spectacular reports, etc - but when it comes to the independent thinking and organization required to define a research project, they fall apart.

That said, to be a good researcher you should be at least a reasonable student. It is extremely difficult to go from a state where you stuggle with basic concepts to one where you can make significant progress in an uncharted field.
 
I've seen several good researchers but bad students wash out of grad school when they hit the qualifying exams. You need to be good enough to get past that hurdle, and then it won't matter as much afterward if you're not great at coursework.
 
eri said:
I've seen several good researchers but bad students wash out of grad school when they hit the qualifying exams.

That happens. So does the reverse - the student who smokes all his tests, but when he has to do something independent, he crumbles. You need some degree of aptitude in both areas to succeed.
 
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hi everyone! I'm a senior majoring in physics, math, and music, and I'm currently in the process applying for theoretical and computational biophysics (primarily thru physics departments) Ph.D. programs. I have a 4.0 from a basically unknown school in the American South, two REUs (T50 and T25) in computational biophysics and two semesters of research in optics (one purely experimental, one comp/exp) at my home institution (since there aren't any biophysics profs at my school), but no...
Back
Top