Good textbook for better understanding calculus?

  • Thread starter Thread starter armolinasf
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculus Textbook
AI Thread Summary
After completing Calculus 1 with Hughes-Hallett, the discussion centers on finding a more conceptually rich calculus book, especially for someone considering a physics major. Spivak's book is highly recommended for its depth and mathematical rigor, though it requires significant time and effort to solve the problems for a thorough understanding. Concerns about its difficulty are noted, but many believe it is manageable with dedication. Courant's book is also mentioned positively, though specifics on its comparison to Spivak are less detailed. Kline's "Calculus: An Intuitive Approach" is considered interesting for its focus on concepts and physical applications, but the effectiveness compared to Spivak or Courant is not clearly established. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the importance of choosing a book that balances conceptual understanding with problem-solving practice, particularly for future physics studies.
armolinasf
Messages
195
Reaction score
0
I've just completed calc 1, the book we used was Hughes-Hallett but I'm looking for a book that that really explains the concepts and gives me a deeper understanding of the subject. I'm seriously considering majoring in physics so I don't know if that would come into consideration when considering a book.

I've heard good things about Spivak and Courrant, but I'm worried that it may be too difficult, or would going through the normal calculus sequence using Hughes-Hallett be good enough preparation?

The other one I've looked at is Kline's calculus: an intuitive approach. It seems interesting because it attempts to explain concepts together with their physical applications How would this one compare with Spivak or Courant?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Spivak's book is amazing. It is more of a maths book, but does include some references to their applications. I don't think the book is too hard to get through, but it's by no means an easy read, be prepared to spend a lot of time solving the problems he gives for a better understanding.
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Back
Top