How many combinations can be formed from 5 binary digits?

  • Thread starter Thread starter otto
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Combinatorics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating combinations formed from 5 binary digits, specifically exploring the relationship between binomial coefficients and their summation. The user attempts to prove that the sum of combinations from 0 to n equals 2^n, referencing Pascal's identity. A challenge arises when handling the case where k equals 0, as it complicates the summation. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding binomial coefficients and their implications in combinatorial proofs. Ultimately, the total number of combinations from 5 binary digits is 32, as each digit can independently be either 0 or 1.
otto
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
So look at what I've done:
<br /> {n+1 \choose k} = \frac {(n+1)!} {(n+1-k)! \cdot k!} = \frac {(n+1)\cdot n!}{(n-(k-1))!\cdot k \cdot (k-1)!}<br /><br /> =<br /> \frac {(n+1)}{k} \cdot<br /> <br /> \frac { n!}{(n-(k-1))!\cdot (k-1)!} =<br /> <br /> \frac {(n+1)}{k} <br /> <br /> \cdot {n \choose k-1}<br /> <br />
oops I accidentally posted this before I finished my calculations, please ignore this until I've finished it. Thanks

[edit] So Yea, that's it. Thing is, somethings wrong (try plugging numbers into it). Anyways, I need to figure out what I did wrong. This is just part of a massive can of worms. I am trying to figure out the proof for: \sum\limits_{i=1}^n {n \choose k} = 2^n<br />
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Pascals identity to be exact. I've read some "proofs" if you can call them that, but they were rather not helpful. math stack exchange.

When I replace my summation from k=0 to n, with the combinatorics: <br /> <br /> \sum_{k=0}^n{n+1 \choose k} =<br /> <br /> \sum_{k=0}^n {n \choose k} +{n \choose k-1} <br /> <br /> I have the problem that k-1 will equal -1 in the first iteration of the summation. don't know how to fix this.
 
otto said:
I am trying to figure out the proof for: <br /> <br /> <br /> \sum\limits_{i=1}^n {n \choose k} = 2^n<br />

The lower limit of the sum should be k=0 because i isn't present in the combinatoric and for reasons you'll eventually find out, it should start at 0.


So you want to prove
<br /> \sum\limits_{k=0}^n {n \choose k} = 2^n<br />

then simply notice that the binomial expansion is

(a+b)^n = \sum\limits_{k=0}^n{n\choose k}a^{n-k}b^k

So for what values of a and b is

\sum\limits_{k=0}^n{n\choose k}a^{n-k}b^k\equiv \sum\limits_{k=0}^n {n \choose k}
 
otto said:
Pascals identity to be exact. I've read some "proofs" if you can call them that, but they were rather not helpful. math stack exchange.

When I replace my summation from k=0 to n, with the combinatorics: <br /> <br /> \sum_{k=0}^n{n+1 \choose k} =<br /> <br /> \sum_{k=0}^n {n \choose k} +{n \choose k-1}<br /> <br /> I have the problem that k-1 will equal -1 in the first iteration of the summation. don't know how to fix this.

The problem here is that ##\binom{n+1}k=\binom nk+\binom n{k-1}## only for k>0; if k=0 then it's just ##\binom nk##, as both are 1. I think the convention is often to let ##\binom n{-1}=0##; then ##\binom{n+1}k=\binom nk+\binom n{k-1}## even when k=0.
 
You are right that the proof by induction approach can turn into a can of worms.
Notice that <br /> \sum\limits_{k=0}^n {n \choose k}<br /> is the total number of ways that any number of items (including 0 and n) can be selected from n items.

If we indicate whether an item is selected or not by 1 or 0, respectively, and put the 1's and 0's in order, we can represent any set of selected items.

For instance, starting with n=5 items, 10110 = select first, don't select second, select third, select fourth, don't select fifth, represents one way of selecting 3 of the 5. Now, how many zero/one patterns can we get from 5 binary digits?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top