GPU drivers in Fedore 34 - understanding the status of the drivers

  • Thread starter Thread starter Arman777
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gpu
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the use of NVIDIA drivers on Fedora 34, where the user initially experienced issues with Nouveau drivers but later enabled NVIDIA drivers without encountering the previous error. Despite this, the terminal output shows Intel graphics instead of NVIDIA, leading to confusion about the driver status. Concerns are raised about the compatibility of NVIDIA drivers with Wayland, the display server used by GNOME, and whether switching to NVIDIA is worthwhile given the user's non-gaming usage. Suggestions include exploring different desktop environments or distributions that better support proprietary drivers. The user is encouraged to seek help through Fedora-specific forums for further assistance.
Arman777
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
2,163
Reaction score
191
Code:
7.5 GiB
Intel® Core™ i5-7200U CPU @ 2.50GHz x 4
NVIDIA Corporation GM108M [GeForce 940MX] / Mesa Intel(R) HD Graphics 620 (KBL GT2)

When I first started to using Fedora 34 I was using Nouveau drivers. However, I guess later on I have enabled the Nvidia drivers. The reason why I am not sure as follows.

1) At the booting time there was an error saying
Nvidia kernel module missing, falling back to nouveau
Now this error is gone.
2) I can open the Nvidia Server Settings
3) When I type
Code:
lsmod | grep nvidia
I am getting.

Code:
nvidia_drm             69632  2
nvidia_modeset       1200128  2 nvidia_drm
nvidia              35332096  72 nvidia_modeset
drm_kms_helper        303104  2 nvidia_drm,i915
drm                   630784  12 drm_kms_helper,nvi

However, In my terminal page (via screenfetch) it says.

1635781042555.png

I did not understand why it shows Intel instead of Nvidia.

I have 2 questions.

1) Is this a bug caused by the screenfetch ?
2) If I am still running Intel is it worth to switch Nvidia Drivers ? (I am not gaming in Linux)

Currently I am around 60 FPS

Code:
301 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.999 FPS
301 frames in 5.0 seconds = 60.011 FPS
300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.999 FPS
301 frames in 5.0 seconds = 60.007 FPS
 
Technology news on Phys.org
You should be able to see the GPU in screenfetch: here's mine:
1635784220529.png

I believe Wayland (the display server Gnome uses) does not play nicely with the proprietary drivers, various solutions probably around using some combination of "Wayland", "nvidea", "gnome" and "fedora" as search terms.

Alternatively install a different desktop or even switch to a different Fedora spin, KDE might be a good one.

Alternatively switch to a different distro which has good support for proprietary drivers out of the box as a feature - did I mention Mint?

If you are going to go down the Linux route you need to get good at searching out help for stuff like this: distro specfic forums are usually the best start: https://fedoraforum.org/ https://ask.fedoraproject.org/
 
pbuk said:
If you are going to go down the Linux route you need to get good at searching out help for stuff like this: distro specfic forums are usually the best start: https://fedoraforum.org/ https://ask.fedoraproject.org/
That's a good idea. Thanks for pointing that out. I have online searched about the problem but not found many.
pbuk said:
I believe Wayland (the display server Gnome uses) does not play nicely with the proprietary drivers, various solutions probably around using some combination of "Wayland", "nvidea", "gnome" and "fedora" as search terms.
I also heard the Wayland term in my research, but I don't know what it means or how it affects the comp. The speed of the comp is good. But I also know that Nvidia drivers are not good with Linux. We all see this video.

So... I might switch to Nvidia, but I am not sure it will be worth the effort or not.
 
Dear Peeps I have posted a few questions about programing on this sectio of the PF forum. I want to ask you veterans how you folks learn program in assembly and about computer architecture for the x86 family. In addition to finish learning C, I am also reading the book From bits to Gates to C and Beyond. In the book, it uses the mini LC3 assembly language. I also have books on assembly programming and computer architecture. The few famous ones i have are Computer Organization and...
I have a quick questions. I am going through a book on C programming on my own. Afterwards, I plan to go through something call data structures and algorithms on my own also in C. I also need to learn C++, Matlab and for personal interest Haskell. For the two topic of data structures and algorithms, I understand there are standard ones across all programming languages. After learning it through C, what would be the biggest issue when trying to implement the same data...
Back
Top