GR, small expansion, (perihelion derivation)

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 2K views
binbagsss
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement



Hi I am looking at the attached as part of the derivation and am stuck on how we go from 18 to 19

IMG_1214.jpg
[/B]

Homework Equations



Above below

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I'm pretty stuck. Lambda is small and not sin so can't see why one would expand out sine in a Taylor, though this seems to be one of the only possibilities I can see and then using a cosines trigomemtric identity, think this would also need expanding out both sin and cos as functions off phi And then regathering for the use of the cosine identity. However as I said small lambda not phi so don't really understand

Thanks
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1214.jpg
    IMG_1214.jpg
    27.7 KB · Views: 615
Physics news on Phys.org
Orodruin said:
Hint: Use a trigonometric identity.
My attempt mentioned this. So it's not cos ( a + b ) ? As I've said above, we are expanding small lambda not phi, so don't really understand how this would apply. Ta .
 
binbagsss said:
[...] small lambda not phi so don't really understand

Alternate hint #1: To see that (18) does indeed imply (19), expand the cos in (19) as a Taylor series in ##\lambda##.

Alternate hint #2: If you didn't already know (19), do as Orodruin suggested, and then consider ##~\cos(\lambda) \approx ~?~## and ##~\sin(\lambda) \approx ~?~##.
 
Last edited: