Gradient equal to multiplying by vector?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Isaac0427
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gradient Vector
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the mathematical properties of electric fields and gradients, specifically examining the equation involving the electric potential and its relationship to the gradient. It confirms that the negative gradient of 1/|r| equals r-hat/|r|^2, which is a key point in understanding electric fields. The conversation also addresses the negative gradient of 2/|r|, with clarification that a multiplicative constant can be factored out of the gradient. Participants agree on the correctness of the equations presented and the implications for electric field calculations. Overall, the thread emphasizes the importance of understanding gradients in the context of electric fields.
Isaac0427
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
718
Reaction score
163
Hi guys!
So I have been researching the electric field, and I have come upon some interesting equations that confused me a little (all from wikipedia):
fe40e6e5030963130cd36c93ca29f634.png
,
400073dd9ef3633c03d01c35c9f6281e.png
, and
8757428f7aeb787795811caa40897baa.png
with V being the same as psi. Doing the algebra, I would get (Q/4πε0)*(r-hat/|r|2)=-∇(Q/4πε0r)-∂A/∂t. Now in the case that A does not change with time, we would get that taking the negative gradient is equal to multiplying by r-hat/|r|. Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, this is true for the gradient of ##\frac{1}{|r|}##. $$-\nabla \frac{1}{|r|} = \frac{\hat{\mathbf{r}}}{|r|^2}, \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;r\neq0.$$
 
MisterX said:
Yes, this is true for the gradient of 1|r|\frac{1}{|r|}.

Would the negative gradient of 2|r|\frac{2}{|r|} be 2r-hat over |r|2?
 
Isaac0427 said:
Would the negative gradient of 2|r|\frac{2}{|r|} be 2r-hat over |r|2?

Sorry, I don't know what happened with the code. I was asking bout 2/|r|
 
Isaac0427 said:
Would the negative gradient of 2|r|\frac{2}{|r|} be 2r-hat over |r|2?
you can always take a moltiplicative constant out of the gradient.

--
lightarrow
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...

Similar threads

Back
Top