Schools Graduate School Admissions for Astronomy Program

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a senior physics student applying to graduate schools in astronomy, expressing concern about their low Physics GRE score despite a strong GPA and research experience. Participants emphasize that while the Physics GRE score is important, particularly for top programs, many schools are increasingly de-emphasizing it in favor of research experience and strong letters of recommendation. Some suggest applying to a range of schools, including those that do not require the GRE, as well as reconsidering the perceived quality of schools like Arizona and Ohio State. The conversation highlights the potential impact of the student's undergraduate institution's reputation on their application, especially given the low GRE score. Overall, the consensus is that while the GRE score is a concern, the student's research background may help mitigate its effects.
NovaGirl
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi Everyone!

I am a senior student going at a liberal arts college currently majoring in Physics. I am applying to graduate schools in Astronomy this fall semester. I would like to ask what are the odds of getting into the best astronomy programs with the following background:

Major GPA: 4.00
Research: I have been doing research NANOGrav (2 years), LIGO at Caltech 1 summer, astronomy research at Caltech 1 summer. Doing a thesis now with NANOGrav.
Papers published: 2 papers and in the process of writing 1 other ones
Physics GRE: 30 percentile
General GRE: 68% CR, 87% Math, still don't know writing
Reference Letters: 2 of them are from my faculty mentors in Caltech, and 1 is from my mentor in my institution who works with NANOGrav.

Based on your experience, can I get into top astronomy programs, i.e Caltech, Harvard etc?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your physics GRE is a little bit worrying, and the largest factor will be how good your letters of recommendation are.
 
  • Like
Likes NovaGirl
Dishsoap said:
Your physics GRE is a little bit worrying, and the largest factor will be how good your letters of recommendation are.
Hi Dishsoap! Thanks for your reply!

I am also planning to apply in other programs from not so good schools like Ohio State, Washington, Arizona etc. Do you think the Physics GRE is going to affect my acceptance everywhere or only in the top ranked schools?

Thanks!
 
NovaGirl said:
Hi Dishsoap! Thanks for your reply!

I am also planning to apply in other programs from not so good schools like Ohio State, Washington, Arizona etc. Do you think the Physics GRE is going to affect my acceptance everywhere or only in the top ranked schools?

Thanks!

I'm not in astronomy and I'm also only a first-year grad student, so take my opinion with a grain of salt. I think that a lot of schools are starting not to care about the physics GRE too much, so as long as you have great letters you will be fine. Also, the fact that you spent two summers at Caltech will help immensely to get in there!
 
The physics GRE kept me out of top schools with similar stats (Harvard, not CalTech in my case). And you did a lot better on it than I did. Many schools now understand that the PGRE isn't any good at predicting how well you'll do in a grad program, and liberal arts school graduates tend to do much worse on it, but not for good reasons (usually a lack of requirements to memorize things, which I've never needed to do since the PGRE/qualifying exams). So apply to a wide range of schools, just in case it holds you back - and also consider applying to the schools that don't require the PGRE anymore.
 
eri said:
The physics GRE kept me out of top schools with similar stats (Harvard, not CalTech in my case). And you did a lot better on it than I did. Many schools now understand that the PGRE isn't any good at predicting how well you'll do in a grad program, and liberal arts school graduates tend to do much worse on it, but not for good reasons (usually a lack of requirements to memorize things, which I've never needed to do since the PGRE/qualifying exams). So apply to a wide range of schools, just in case it holds you back - and also consider applying to the schools that don't require the PGRE anymore.

Thank you for your reply Eri! If I may ask, when did you apply for grad school?
 
NovaGirl said:
I am also planning to apply in other programs from not so good schools like Ohio State, Washington, Arizona etc.

You do realize that Arizona is the best (pure) Astronomy school in the country, right? If that's "not so good", I am not sure what is. It is regularly ranked in the very top tier, as is Ohio State. I think you need to start discussing program quality with your advisor.

Next, your pGRE is very important (and not competitive). Unless your LAC sends an army of people to grad school (a la Reed or Harvey Mudd) the committee will have no idea how to normalize a 4.0. A 4.0 with a 30% percentile on the GRE will be interpreted as a case of grade inflation. Letters only go so far - if the committee doesn't think you will pass your qualifying exam, it knows it doesn't matter how good a researcher you will be, because you won't get that far. And remember, you don't know what's in those letters.

I would advise you to apply to a wide range of schools, particularly smaller schools that are strong in areas of interest.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes NovaGirl
While I do think one can compensate for a low PGRE score, there is most likely a lower limit around 700.
 
radium said:
While I do think one can compensate for a low PGRE score, there is most likely a lower limit around 700.

This is the exact sentiment that I heard from an advisor for an REU I did as an undergrad. The mindset I was encouraged to have is that if one does well on the pGRE they are likely well-equipped to handle graduate coursework (assuming their performance on pGRE-type problems was indicative of having learned the material at a deeper level), but if they don't perform well on it, it doesn't really reflect poorly on the student. However, this is only true for pGRE scores that are not in what he referred to as the "abysmal" range, which was <650. And in my experience, this was true. I busted my rump studying for the pGRE (having to teach myself entire courses of material in some cases) to pass and ended up with a 750. In my case, I did not learn the material at a deep level, so my pGRE performance was completely misaligned with my preparation for graduate school (as I'm now learning, sigh). However, my research experience was able to compensate for a pGRE score on the "lower end" - I was admitted to all 12 schools that I applied to.

Many of my peers also took the physics GRE and scored in the 400s - this led to them applying for 20+ schools and being admitted to exactly zero (although they also had very little research experience).
 
  • #10
You listed some pretty good schools in the "not so good" category, so I would not be optimistic.

Unless you get that PGRE score up, a lot will depend on the reputation of your undergrad school, whether your degree is a BS or BA in physics, and what undergrad math and physics courses are on your transcript.

Someone probably should slap your profs for giving you straight As if the best you can manage on the PGRE is a 30th percentile. You were cheated.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
853
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top