MHB Graph Rational Function By Hand

mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Graph $f(x) = \frac{2}{(x - 3)}$ on the xy-plane by building a table of values. 1. How many values of x must I use to graph this function?2. Must I use the same amount of negative values of x as positive values of x to form an even number of points in the form (x, y)?3. Is graphing by hand an important skill to know considering that graphing calculators do the job for us?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi RTCNTC,

1) There's no hard rule on how many values you should use. The more values you use the smoother/accurate the graph would be.

2) Again this depends on which domain you want to draw the graph in.

I would choose $x$ values from -10 to +10 with increments of 1 (total of 20 values) to draw this graph, so that I have an understanding of what happens in negative values as well as positive values.
 
Another thing that helps with graphing functions by hand is to look at transformations...for example in this problem we should observe that:

$$f(x)=2g(x-3)$$

where:

$$g(x)=\frac{1}{x}$$

You should be familiar with how the graph of $g$ appears, and we see that $f$ is just moved to the right 3 units and vertically stretched by a factor of 2 relative to $g$. This will give you a good idea of what to expect before you begin constructing your table of points on the given function. :)
 
MarkFL said:
Another thing that helps with graphing functions by hand is to look at transformations...for example in this problem we should observe that:

$$f(x)=2g(x-3)$$

where:

$$g(x)=\frac{1}{x}$$

You should be familiar with how the graph of $g$ appears, and we see that $f$ is just moved to the right 3 units and vertically stretched by a factor of 2 relative to $g$. This will give you a good idea of what to expect before you begin constructing your table of points on the given function. :)

There's an entire chapter dedicated to transformations in Cohen's book but I am not there yet. I honestly think that posting every even number problem from David Cohen's book will take me years to complete one course. I will post the essentials of precalculus from now on by searching online for topics that every precalculus student should know well before stepping into a first semester calculus course.

- - - Updated - - -

Sudharaka said:
Hi RTCNTC,

1) There's no hard rule on how many values you should use. The more values you use the smoother/accurate the graph would be.

2) Again this depends on which domain you want to draw the graph in.

I would choose $x$ values from -10 to +10 with increments of 1 (total of 20 values) to draw this graph, so that I have an understanding of what happens in negative values as well as positive values.

Cool. I thank you for your input. I have decided to post the essentials of precalculus from now on. Keep in mind that this a self-study of a course I took in 1993. I got an A minus in precalculus at Lehman College. Not bad for someone majoring in sociology at the time.
 
Without doing any "calculation" or using a calculator (mine is on the other side of the room and I can't be bothered to walk that far) I would first see that "x- 3" and think "okay, there is a vertical asymptote at x= 3". I would also not that, as x goes to infinity, the numerator stays the same while the denominator gets bigger and bigger so the fraction goes to 0. I would also see that the same thing happens as x goes to negative infinity. The graph gets closer and closer to y= 0 as x goes to positive or negative infinity: y= 0 is a horizontal asymptote. Finally, I see that for x positive the whole fraction is positive while if x is negative, the whole fraction is negative. That is, the graph goes from the top of the graph at x= 3 and curves down to the x-axis to the right side of the graph but goes from 0 on the left up to the top of the graph at x= 3.
 
I will graph it tomorrow.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top