Graphing a Heaviside unit function

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around graphing the solution to a differential equation involving the Dirac delta function and the Heaviside unit step function. The original poster attempts to understand how to graph the resulting function derived from the Laplace transform of the equation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the transformation of the solution into a more manageable form for graphing. Questions arise regarding the behavior of the sine function between specific intervals and the implications of manipulating the sine terms.

Discussion Status

Participants have provided helpful guidance on interpreting the sine function's behavior in relation to the Heaviside step functions. There is an ongoing exploration of how the graph changes over time, particularly between the intervals defined by the delta function's influence.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on understanding the implications of the Heaviside function and the periodic nature of the sine function, with some uncertainty about the correct interpretation of the graph's behavior after specific time points.

EngageEngage
Messages
203
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Graphing a Heaviside unit function

Homework Statement


find solution of the following differential eq and graph it:

[tex]y'' + 4y = \delta(t-2\pi)[/tex]
[tex]y(0)=0[/tex]
[tex]y'(0)=0[/tex]

Homework Equations


[tex]\delta[/tex]
is the Dirac delta function
[tex]u_{c}[/tex]
is the Heaviside unit step function

The Attempt at a Solution



I used the laplace transform and found the solution to be:

[tex]\frac{1}{2}u_{\pi}(sin(2(t-\pi)))-\frac{1}{2}u_{2\pi}(sin(2(t-2\pi)))[/tex]

which i checked and it is right. However, I'm not sure how to graph this. The following is what I have:

before t = pi and after t = 2pi, y = 0.
But, in between what will it be? If anyone could please help me out I would greatly appreciate it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As the sine function is periodic, you can write the expression as
[tex] \frac{1}{2}sin2t(u_{\pi}-u_{2\pi})[/tex]
Now can you proceed?
 
Thank you for the help! So, then from pi to 2 pi I will just have that sine wave? Also, if you could please help me figure this out:

so then is this:
[tex]\frac{1}{2}u_{\pi}(sin(2(t-\pi)))-\frac{1}{2}u_{2\pi}(sin(2(t-2\pi)))[/tex]
not the same as this?:
[tex]\frac{1}{2}u_{\pi}(sin(2(t-\pi)))+\frac{1}{2}u_{2\pi}(-sin(2(t-2\pi)))[/tex]
 
Thank you for the help! So, then from pi to 2 pi I will just have that sine wave?
Correct :)

About the second question, yes you can take the minus sign with the sine term, that's basic multiplication. sin(2t-2pi) = sin(2t-4pi) = sin(2t)
 
Thanks again, but I'm not sure that i stated the second question right. I mean that if i bring the minus sign inside of the parenthesis it implies to me (maybe incorrectly) that the second sine wave will start at 2pi and propagate to infinity.
 
Okay let me clear things up a bit,
You follow how
[tex]\frac{1}{2}u_{\pi}(sin(2(t-\pi)))-\frac{1}{2}u_{2\pi}(sin(2(t-2\pi)))[/tex]
becomes
[tex]\frac{1}{2}sin(2t)u_{\pi}-\frac{1}{2}sin(2t)u_{2\pi}[/tex]
correct?
Now the first term is the sine function from pi to infinity, the second term is the sine function from 2pi to infinity. Taking difference of the two graphs gives the combined graph.
 
Last edited:
Ahh, I for some reason pictured this differently. But i definitely see now. Thank you for the help arunbg!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K