Graphing an Equation with a Complex Term

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around graphing the complex function w(t) = (1+t)e^jt, where participants explore how to represent complex numbers on a graph with respect to real and imaginary axes. The context involves understanding the nature of complex functions and their graphical representation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need for multiple axes to represent complex numbers and question how to effectively plot points in the complex plane. There are inquiries about the number of points needed for a meaningful graph and the nature of the graph itself, whether it represents a curve or surface.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants sharing specific values of t and their corresponding complex outputs. Some guidance has been provided regarding the necessity of plotting additional points to better understand the graph's shape. There is a mix of interpretations about the dimensionality of the graph, with some suggesting it is a curve while others explore the concept of surfaces.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention constraints related to their current coursework, specifically referencing vector calculus and the challenges posed by the curriculum. There is also a recognition of the abstract nature of visualizing complex functions.

salman213
Messages
301
Reaction score
1
1. If you`re given an equation such as

w(t) = (1+t)e^jt

how would I go about graphing it.

For different values of t i get a different complex number

but how do I represent that complex number on a

w(t), (t) axis?

 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you need are three axes: one for values of t, and two axes (the complex plane) for w(t). Also, remember that e^(it) = cos(t) + i*sin(t). (Mathematicians normally use i for the imaginary unit.)
 
thanks, can you tell me what should i do in order to draw it i got three points

t = -10 i get 7.55 - j4.90
t = 0 i get 1
t = 10 i get -9.22 - 5.98

the question said to graph for t (-10 to 10).

but even with theses threee points I am having trouble on how to draw the graph(i guess its a plane??) on a paper...i think i need more then just the three points to draw it :S any advice??
 
Do you know how to graph points in the complex plane? The complex plane is the same as the real plane, except that the Real axis is the horizontal axis and the Imaginary axis is the vertical axis. For t = -10, you will have a point that is 7.55 units to the right of the origin, and 4.9 units down from the real axis.
 
Yes even after I have plotted the three points i am not able to imagine the plane that this creates :S, i don't know it just seems to abstract to draw on a paper..
 
You'll need to plot more points to get an idea of the shape of the graph.
 
Three points determine a plane. If this is not a plane (and you should have seen immediately that it is not) you need a lot more than 3 points to graph it.
 
Do you think there are particular points I should try and get? like before if I had some plane

2x + y +z = 1

I find the three intercepts (0,0,1), (1/2,0,0) ,(0,1,0)

and then connect the points which gives me an idea of the shape of the plane easily.

but in this one i don't really know what points I should be looking for to give me the best picture of the plane..

any ideas?
 
Ok, what else do i need in order to graph it? See the thing is our curriculum is sort of weird since I'm taking vector calculus right now. If I had already completed that course probably I would have a better idea. In another course I should know how to graph this equation. Anyways can someone hint what other things I should know before I'm able to graph this this type of equation?
 
  • #10
As I said before, you should plot more points. The three you've chosen (for t = -10, t = 0, t = 10) aren't enough to get an understanding of the graph of w(t) = (1 + t)e^(it). If you plot the points for t = -10, -9, -8, ..., 0, 1, 2, 3, ..., 10, you'll get a better idea.

It would also be helpful to label each point you plot in the complex plane, e.g., t = 2, or whatever the value of t is.
 
  • #11
so to graph the surface this function represents the only way is to plot points? Is there nothing else I can do other then just plotting various points to try imagine the plane?
 
  • #12
salman213 said:
so to graph the surface this function represents the only way is to plot points? Is there nothing else I can do other then just plotting various points to try imagine the plane?
In the complex plane, the graph of this function is a curve, not a surface, and also not a plane, either. The most obvious thing to do would be to plot a few points on the curve, but for some reason you seem very reluctant to do that.
 
  • #13
but how is it not some type of surface because shouldn't there be THREE axis?

t (real axis), w(t) = imaginary + real axis...and so wouldn't that function represent some type of surface...

Anyways, two more points:

t = -5
=> -1.1 - j3.84
t = 5
=> 1.7 - j5.755

is one these graphs correct?
http://img390.imageshack.us/img390/4868/65821680sl9.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #14
No, it's not a surface. If you graph it it three dimensions, the points will define a curve in space. If you graph the points in just the complex plane, it's still a curve, but projected onto the complex plane.

I think that the curve will look like a sort of spiral, but you still don't have enough points to be able to see it. Bite the bullet and plot some more points.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K