Graphing of a logarithmic function

AI Thread Summary
To graph the logarithmic function expressed as some constant = y + log x, it is essential to solve for y, resulting in y = some constant - log x. This method involves calculating corresponding y values for selected x values, which can be time-consuming. However, it is possible to visualize the graph by recognizing the shape of y = log x and shifting it left by the constant value. This approach simplifies the process and allows for a quicker understanding of the graph's behavior. Ultimately, both methods can be valid depending on the desired accuracy and efficiency.
gliteringstar
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I am facing difficulty in graphing this logarithmic function:

some constant= y + log x

what all steps are required to graph such a function?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Solve for y, then use this equation to calculate corresponding y values for a handful of x values.
 
thanks chris for your reply,but won't it take time to solve it through this method?

what i mean is-we know the graph of y=log x
also,the equation of logarithmic function can be written as:

some constant-log x= y,but by plotting it through putting various values of x,won't it be time consuming?...can't we simply visualise its graph by knowing how y=logx looks like and then, shifting the graph to the left by that constant value?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top