MHB Graphs of Negative Fractional Powers x^(-p/q)

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the graphs of negative fractional powers, specifically x^(-p/q). The value of p/q significantly influences the shape and behavior of the graph, affecting both the domain and range. The domain is defined by the conditions where the function is valid, often excluding values that make the denominator zero or violate square root conditions. The range can be more complex to determine but can often be estimated based on the function's behavior. Asymptotes are identified by analyzing the limits of the function as it approaches critical points, such as the zeros of the denominator.
confusedatmath
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Can someone explain how these graphs are drawn. How does the value of p/q affect this graph? How does the domain and range change? How are the asymptotes found?

The below is an image about what I'm talking about:

View attachment 1831

Here is a question the deals with this type of graph (no idea how to solve it because I'm unfamiliar with these kind of graphs)

View attachment 1832
 

Attachments

  • q1a.jpg
    q1a.jpg
    45.6 KB · Views: 170
  • q1b.jpg
    q1b.jpg
    16.4 KB · Views: 119
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Think about the domain as where the function is defined. For example, if you think of a fraction with a polynomial in the denominator then it it is defined for all numbers except for the zeros of this polynomial. If you have a square root then it has to be defined for only positive integers. If you have both then you have to take care of both conditions. As for the range it is a little bit tricker to work with but for the most time you can guess it.

Take the following example

$$f(x)=\frac{1}{x+a}$$

What is the domain, range and horizontal and vertical asymptotes ?
 
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
31
Views
2K