MHB Graphs of Negative Fractional Powers x^(-p/q)

confusedatmath
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Can someone explain how these graphs are drawn. How does the value of p/q affect this graph? How does the domain and range change? How are the asymptotes found?

The below is an image about what I'm talking about:

View attachment 1831

Here is a question the deals with this type of graph (no idea how to solve it because I'm unfamiliar with these kind of graphs)

View attachment 1832
 

Attachments

  • q1a.jpg
    q1a.jpg
    45.6 KB · Views: 155
  • q1b.jpg
    q1b.jpg
    16.4 KB · Views: 111
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Think about the domain as where the function is defined. For example, if you think of a fraction with a polynomial in the denominator then it it is defined for all numbers except for the zeros of this polynomial. If you have a square root then it has to be defined for only positive integers. If you have both then you have to take care of both conditions. As for the range it is a little bit tricker to work with but for the most time you can guess it.

Take the following example

$$f(x)=\frac{1}{x+a}$$

What is the domain, range and horizontal and vertical asymptotes ?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top