Gravimetric Attraction Akin to that of a Neutron Star

AI Thread Summary
In a classic Thor comic, Thor is affected by a Graviton Bomb, which subjects him to a gravimetric attraction similar to that of a neutron star. This results in him being pulled down by an immense gravitational force, ultimately burying him under a massive structure of metal, estimated to be 50 feet high and 20 feet wide. The term "gravimetric" relates to both weight and gravity, leading to confusion about whether Thor is buried under the weight of a neutron star or merely experiencing its gravitational pull. The mass of a neutron star is approximately 1.4 to 1.5 times that of the sun. The discussion raises questions about calculating the weight of the material Thor is buried under, particularly in relation to the weight of a sugar cube-sized amount of neutron star material, which is suggested to weigh around a billion tons. The calculations involve determining how many sugar cubes fit into the volume of the metal structure to assess the total weight Thor is under.
Uberhulk
Messages
30
Reaction score
3
This relates to a feat in a classic Thor comic. Thor is blasted by a Graviton Bomb and "is instantly subject to a gravimetric attraction akin to that of a neutron star.". He is then "pulled irresistibly down by the incalculable increase in local gravity and is quickly buried from view by an ever compacting mass of unimaginable tonnage".

We see him buried under a rectangular mountain of metal, possibly 50 ft high and 20 ft wide.

I know gravimetric can relate to weight and also gravity. The mass of a neutron star is 1.4 (or 1.5 according to other sources) that of our sun.

http://www.space.com/22180-neutron-stars.html

I'm confused by the statements relating to gravimetric and mass. Does this mean Thor is buried under the weight of a neutron star or is subject to the gravitational pull of a neutron star? If the latter is the case and a sugar cube of this matter weighs a billion tons to calculate the weight do we determine how many cubes of sugar are in 1000 ft sq (20 x 50)? If so if a cube of sugar is 1 in square what's the weight he's buried under?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Uberhulk said:
This relates to a feat in a classic Thor comic. Thor is blasted by a Graviton Bomb and "is instantly subject to a gravimetric attraction akin to that of a neutron star.". He is then "pulled irresistibly down by the incalculable increase in local gravity and is quickly buried from view by an ever compacting mass of unimaginable tonnage".

We see him buried under a rectangular mountain of metal, possibly 50 ft high and 20 ft wide.

I know gravimetric can relate to weight and also gravity. The mass of a neutron star is 1.4 (or 1.5 according to other sources) that of our sun.

http://www.space.com/22180-neutron-stars.html

I'm confused by the statements relating to gravimetric and mass. Does this mean Thor is buried under the weight of a neutron star or is subject to the gravitational pull of a neutron star? If the latter is the case and a sugar cube of this matter weighs a billion tons to calculate the weight do we determine how many cubes of sugar are in 1000 ft sq (20 x 50)? If so if a cube of sugar is 1 in square what's the weight he's buried under?
is there anything you can do to reduce the number of questions?
 
I wonder how much stories were written, that involve space fighters, and arent so soft as Star wars. I dont think missiles totally make fighter craft obsolate, for example the former cant escort shuttles if one wants to capture a celestial body. I dont insist fighters have to be manned (i enjoyed Enders game about someone control the events for afar) but i also think it isnt totally unjustifiable.
I thought I had discovered a giant plot hole in Avatar universe, but apparently it's based on a faulty notion. So, the anti-gravity effect that lifts whole mountains into the sky is unrelated to the unobtanium deposits? Apparently the value of unobtanium is in its property as a room temperature superconductor, which enables their superluminal drive technology. Unobtanium is found in large deposits underground, which is why they want to mine the ground. OK. So, these mountains - which...
So far I've been enjoying the show but I am curious to hear from those a little more knowledgeable of the Dune universe as my knowledge is only of the first Dune book, The 1984 movie, The Sy-fy channel Dune and Children of Dune mini series and the most recent two movies. How much material is it pulling from the Dune books (both the original Frank Herbert and the Brian Herbert books)? If so, what books could fill in some knowledge gaps?

Similar threads

Replies
51
Views
9K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
94
Views
11K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top