Gravitaional Potential Energy help, please

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the gravitational potential energy of a system of three spheres after one is removed. The user initially used the formula U=-G(m1m2/r12 + m1m3/r13 + ...) to compute the potential energy but received an incorrect result. After reviewing their calculations, they identified a small error that led to the wrong answer. The user ultimately resolved the issue on their own. The thread highlights the importance of careful calculation in physics problems.
chemEcook
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Four uniform spheres, with masses mA = 350 kg, mB = 600 kg, mC = 1500 kg, and mD = 300 kg, have (x, y) coordinates of (0, 50 cm), (0, 0), (-80 cm, 0), and (40 cm, 0), respectively. Sphere A is then removed.
(a) Calculate the gravitational potential energy of the remaining three-particle system.



Homework Equations


U=-Gm1m2/r12-Gm1m3/r13-...


The Attempt at a Solution


U=-G(McMd/Rcd+McMb/Rcb+MbMd/Rbd)
U=-G(1500*300/.12+1500*600/.8+600*300/.4)=-3.55e-4 J
It's telling me this is wrong but I can't see where I'm going wrong. Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Nevermind. I found my small error. Thanks, anyway.
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'

Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'

In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

How Is Potential Energy Converted to Kinetic Energy in Physical Systems?
Replies
6
Views
1K
Find the potential, kinetic, and mechanical energy
Replies
22
Views
4K
A really confusing question on potential energy,
Replies
4
Views
2K
Question regarding electrical potential energy required to assemble a system
Replies
6
Views
4K
How close will body approach fixed point charge?
Replies
1
Views
1K
Potential Gradient [Question(s) regarding the concept]
Replies
17
Views
4K
Potential Energy and Velocity of a Spaceship
Replies
2
Views
3K
How far does the block slide? (work, spring, incline)
Replies
4
Views
2K
Two charges, Electrical Potential
Replies
11
Views
7K
Binding energy / mass deficit of Earth-moon system?
Replies
3
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top