Gravitation #3.14: Showing dF=0 as Geometric Version of Maxwell's Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter Living_Dog
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravitation
Living_Dog
Messages
98
Reaction score
0
How does one show that dF = 0 is the geometric version of Maxwell's equations??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I guess you mean that dF is a 2-form in four dimensions, so it has six independent fields (the electromagnetic fields):

dF=E_idx^idt+\frac{1}{2}\epsilon_{ijk}B_idx^jdx^k

Now the homogeneous Maxwell equation read dF=0. For the other two equations, introduce a 3-form for the 4-current

J=J_1dx^1dx^2dt+J_2dx^3dx^4dt+J_3dx^1dx^2dt+\rho dx^1dx^2dx^3

So the inhomogeneous Maxwell equations are dF = -4 \pi J. Note that, since d^2 = 0, J satisfies the continuity equation dJ = 0.
 
Petr Mugver said:
I guess you mean that dF is a 2-form in four dimensions, so it has six independent fields (the electromagnetic fields):

dF=E_idx^idt+\frac{1}{2}\epsilon_{ijk}B_idx^jdx^k

Now the homogeneous Maxwell equation read dF=0. For the other two equations, introduce a 3-form for the 4-current

J=J_1dx^1dx^2dt+J_2dx^3dx^4dt+J_3dx^1dx^2dt+\rho dx^1dx^2dx^3

So the inhomogeneous Maxwell equations are dF = -4 \pi J. Note that, since d^2 = 0, J satisfies the continuity equation dJ = 0.

.
.
...huh? I know that dF=0 is Maxwell's equations. I asked:
.
.
How does one show that dF = 0 is the geometric version of Maxwell's equations??
.
.
E.g. if I wanted to show it was frame-independent, then I would perform a Lorentz boost and show how the same equation appears, but with primes.
.
.
I'm sorry, but I don't know how to ask this question more clearly. I guess it's b/c I don't understand it. But then again, that's why I posted it.
 
Petr Mugver said:
I guess you mean that dF is a 2-form in four dimensions, so it has six independent fields (the electromagnetic fields):

dF=E_idx^idt+\frac{1}{2}\epsilon_{ijk}B_idx^jdx^k

Now the homogeneous Maxwell equation read dF=0. For the other two equations, introduce a 3-form for the 4-current

J=J_1dx^1dx^2dt+J_2dx^3dx^4dt+J_3dx^1dx^2dt+\rho dx^1dx^2dx^3

So the inhomogeneous Maxwell equations are dF = -4 \pi J. Note that, since d^2 = 0, J satisfies the continuity equation dJ = 0.

I misunderstood the question. They were probably asking to show that Maxwell's equations can be obtained from this geometric version. I can do that having read section 4.5 of the text.

Thanks for your help.
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Back
Top