Gravitation and Motion Equations

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the standard equations of motion, which describe motion under constant acceleration, and how they can be adapted to include gravitational effects. Gravitation is expressed as a force that must be converted into acceleration for use in motion equations, leading to the derived gravitational acceleration formula. Despite attempts to incorporate gravitational acceleration into motion equations, the resulting motion remains parabolic due to the variable nature of "r," which changes with the object's position. The poster seeks a unified equation that accurately calculates motion under gravitational influence without relying on iterative methods. The inquiry highlights the limitations of current equations in capturing the complexities of motion influenced by gravity.
Sobeita
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
The standard equation for motion is:

X= .5 * ax * t^2 + vx * t (+ cx)
Y= .5 * ay * t^2 + vy * t (+ cy)

...and of course, you can expand it to include more axes and more orders if you like.

Gravitation is a force, but to use it in the motion equation, you need it in acceleration form.

Fg= G * mM / r^2;
F= m*a; Ag = Fg/m;
Ag= G * M / r^2.

But if you use substitution, using Ag, the motion equation is still always parabolic, despite what we know about orbits. The cause is obviously the presence of the "r" variable, which is dependent on the position of the object (so that acceleration changes based on its position, and that position affects the acceleration, and both change continuously.)

With an iterative approach, I am able to approximate motion due to gravitation. The result is essentially a long string of parabolas.

Is there a way to combine these two equations, Ag and motion, into a true unified equation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sobeita said:
The standard equation for motion is:

X= .5 * ax * t^2 + vx * t (+ cx)
Y= .5 * ay * t^2 + vy * t (+ cy)
These equations only apply to motion with constant acceleration; they are not true in general.
 
That was more or less the purpose of posting this question. Is there an equation that can calculate motion due to gravitation, without using some sort of sigma iteration approach?
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top