Gravitation deep hole physics problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the work done to lift a 1-kg mass from a deep hole that reaches half of Earth's radius. The initial approach incorrectly used the gravitational force formula, prompting clarification that the correct formula is F = m * (GM/r^2). It was emphasized that only the mass of Earth interior to the lifted mass should be considered, with a uniform mass density assumption for calculations. Participants discussed how to compute the volume of the interior section, leading to a better understanding of the problem. Ultimately, the original poster expressed gratitude for the guidance received, indicating they can now complete the problem.
brad sue
Messages
270
Reaction score
0
Hi I am stuck with this problem:
A deep hole in Earth reaches a depth of one half of Earth's radius. How much work is done when a 1-kg mass is slowly lifted from the bottom of the hole to Earth's surface?
I use the expression of the gravitation force, F=GMm/R3
so the work would be:
integral (F*(R/2)) from R=R/2 to R=R
I am not sure I am right so I need your input please.
Thank you
Brad
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Make sure you include the dependence that M has on r (the integration variable).
 
Your Force function is incorrect.

The Gravitational Force has an INVERSE SQUARE form F = m \frac{GM}{r^2} .
The Force by Gravity will only be due to the mass of Earth that is
INTERIOR to the mass being lifted - presume uniform mass density, that is M = M_E \frac{V_{inside}}{V_E} .
 
Last edited:
lightgrav said:
Your Force function is incorrect.

The Gravitational Force has an INVERSE SQUARE form F = m \frac{GM}{r^2} .
The Force by Gravity will only be due to the mass of Earth that is
INTERIOR to the mass being lifted - presume uniform mass density, that is M = M_E \frac{V_{inside}}{V_E} .

Thank you.
But How can I compute the Vinside? we only have the length nothing else?
B
 
Volume? LxWxH !
Yeah, rxrxr = r^3 , the variable r ,
compared with R_E^3 , the maximum R .
 
lightgrav said:
Volume? LxWxH !
Yeah, rxrxr = r^3 , the variable r ,
compared with R_E^3 , the maximum R .

OK! I am sorry . sometimes I am a little bit way off!

thank you so much
I can finish this problem now.

B
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top