Gravitation Potential Energy Help

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the ratio of energy required to place a mass M into orbit near Earth's surface versus sending it into distant space. Participants clarify that the energy for orbit is a small positive value, while the energy for escape is significantly larger. The binding energy formula and total mechanical energy for an orbiting satellite are discussed, highlighting that the ratio is not simply 1:1 due to differing values of "r." It is concluded that the kinetic energy required for escape is twice that of the energy needed for orbit, suggesting a ratio of 1:2. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding gravitational potential energy in these calculations.
krypt0nite
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Calculate the ratio of the energy that would be required to put a mass M into orbit near the Earth's surface (if there were no friction) and the energy to put the same into distant space.

I'm stuck. How am i suppose to calculate the ratio. I know the that the energy to put M into orbit near the Earth's surface would be a small positive energy while putting it into distant space would be a large positive energy.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The signs are purely conventional.Actually for gravitational potential energy,it is MINUS INSTEAD OF PLUS...
The gravity field of a spherically symmetric celestial body (i.e.Earth) is CONSERVATIVE,which means u can apply the law of conservation of total energy.

Can u compute the energy required to put a mass into orbit near the surface of the Earth??

Daniel.
 
There are no values given to me so i don't know how to compute it
 
I'm not sure how to find the answer, but I can tell you this: Binding energy is the additional energy you have to supply a satellite (or anything in orbit) to escape the Earth's gravitational field. This is the formula for it:
E_{binding}=\frac{Gm_1m_2}{2r}

When a satellite is in orbit, it's total energy (total mechanical energy) is:
E_{mechanical}=-\frac{Gm_1m_2}{2r}

So I guess the ratio would be 1:1?
 
Not really.The second formula doesn't hold for bodies on the Earth (which do not orbit,hence do not have KE),so i guess the OP is correct.The problem is missing some data...

Daniel.
 
Wouldn't the "r" be different values so I don't think they can be 1:1?
I was thinking more like 1:1/r ratio would make sense.
 
krypt0nite said:
Calculate the ratio of the energy that would be required to put a mass M into orbit near the Earth's surface (if there were no friction) and the energy to put the same into distant space.

I'm stuck. How am i suppose to calculate the ratio. I know the that the energy to put M into orbit near the Earth's surface would be a small positive energy while putting it into distant space would be a large positive energy.
For near Earth orbit:

mv^2/R = F = GMm/R^2

Which is:
(1)2KE = GMm/R
where KE is the kinetic energy of the orbiting body, which is just -1/2 * its gravitational potential at radius R.

The condition for distant space (escape) is:

PE \ge 0

You should see from (1) that 2KE_{orbit} + PE_{orbit} = 0, which means that the kinetic energy required for escape is ______ the KE for orbit. I think that should help you answer the question.

AM
 
So ratio would be 1:2?
 
krypt0nite said:
So ratio would be 1:2?
If you mean: Kinetic energy of escape = 2 KE of orbit, then yes.

AM
 
Back
Top