Gravity & Massless Particles: Why Does it Affect Photons?

  • Thread starter Thread starter alex.b
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravitation
alex.b
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
1. "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitation" " is a general term describing the attractive influence that all objects with mass exert on each other.
2. The http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon" is massless,has no electric charge and does not decay spontaneously in empty space.

My question is why does gravity affect particles without mass (like photons) ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
alex.b said:
1. "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitation" " is a general term describing the attractive influence that all objects with mass exert on each other.
2. The http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon" is massless,has no electric charge and does not decay spontaneously in empty space.

My question is why does gravity affect particles without mass (like photons) ?

You have been misled by Newton for too long.
Newton's most important contribution to science was his mathematical definition of how motion changes with time. He showed that the force causing apples to fall is the same force that drives planetary motions and produces tides. However, Newton was puzzled by the fact that gravity seemed to operate instantaneously at a distance. He admitted he could only describe it without understanding how it worked. Not until Einstein's general theory of relativity was gravity changed from a "force" to the movement of matter along the shortest space in a curved spacetime. The Sun bends spacetime, and spacetime tells planets how to move. For Newton, both space and time were absolute. Space was a fixed, infinite, unmoving metric against which absolute motions could be measured. Newton also believed the universe was pervaded by a single absolute time that could be symbolized by an imaginary clock off somewhere in space. Einstein changed all this with his relativity theories, and once wrote, "Newton, forgive me."
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Very well said, kahooman. I make only one addition for the beneift of the OP:
kahoomann said:
The Sun bends spacetime, and spacetime tells planets and photons how to move.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top