I Gravitational force at the Earth's centre

AI Thread Summary
At the Earth's center, the gravitational force is effectively zero due to the cancellation of forces from all directions, as explained by the shell theorem. An observer at this point would not feel any gravitational pull, as all parts of their body are equally attracted in every direction. This absence of feeling gravity is distinct from the sensation of tension or contact forces experienced when standing or sitting. Even though gravity exists throughout the universe, at the Earth's center, the symmetrical nature of the Earth results in no net gravitational force acting on an individual. Thus, while gravity is present, it does not create a sensation of weight at the center of the Earth.
Grahame1
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
One of my students asked if the graviational force at the Earth's centre is zero. The question was thrown open to the other students and two possible answers were given: zero or infinite! One way of reasoning is to say that the graviational force sums to zero as (assuming uniformity of the Earth) for every force pulling one way is 'cancelled' by and equal and opposite force. But I then imagined modelling the pull of gravity by tension in a rope. Suppose you hold two ropes, one in each hand and the ropes pull in opposite directions with the same magnitude of force. It is true that I wouldn't accelerate as the forces 'cancel' (note the quotation marks), but I certainly wouldn't feel zero force! So the question is: would an observer at Earth's centre feel zero gravity, or would that observer feel the gravitational pull outwards (in all dirctions) towards the surrounding mass?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Zero gravity. Every particle of your body is pulled in both directions (every direction, in fact) and the forces cancel on every particle, so you feel nothing. That's not the same as having a rope tied to each arm.

The "shell theorem" is the thing to look up.
 
Google spherical shell theorem.

A flip answer is that you cannot "feel" gravity at all, as long as it is uniform. It pulls on all parts of your body equally. What you "feel" instead is the contact force of your feet on the floor or your butt in your chair and the various internal compression and tension forces that keep you standing upright on your feet or keep you from slumping out of your chair.

Edit to add: An astronaut in a spacecraft orbiting in low Earth orbit about 200 miles up is subject to a force of gravity that is about 90% as strong as on the Earth's surface. The astronaut feels weightless because nothing is pushing on him, not because there is no gravity.
 
Last edited:
0. Suppose you have non zero gravity, and at moment 0 you are at rest, by Newton's second law, you will have a non-zero acceleration, but which way? The globe is symmetrical, no direction is more privileged than others. Hence the gravity by Earth at Earth center should be 0.
 
Though the Earth's gravity would no longer be acting on you (since presumably you would already be at it's center of mass), you would still be subject to the gravitation force of other matter and energy in our solar system and beyond, given sufficient time for the space-time curvature (i.e., gravity) to reach you.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top