Gravitational Force Units Question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between gravitational force and acceleration in the context of a physics formula. A user questions why acceleration (a) can be equated to gravitational force when the units appear different. It is clarified that the left side represents acceleration (m/s²), while the right side, which involves gravitational constant G and mass terms, actually represents force (kg*m/s²). The distinction between adding and multiplying masses in the gravitational force formula is emphasized, correcting a misunderstanding. The conversation highlights the importance of unit consistency in physics equations.
philipp2020
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
I just have a question concerning a previous thread about gravitation.

The formula is from post 19 at https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=635188&page=2


v= dr/dt

a = dv/dt

multiply by dv/dt by dr/dr:

a = (dr dv)/(dt dr) = v dv/dr

This gets you to the first step:

v dv/dr = -G (m1 + m2) / r2


My question is: Why is it possible to set a = v dv/dr = -G (m1 + m2) / r2 ?

On the left side there are units of acceleration (m/s^2) and on the right side is the gravitational force (kg*m/s^2). Shouldn't the units at all time be the same on both sides?

Thanks very much for an answer.

Regards, Philipp
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hey philipp, please use \LaTeX. it ain't hard.
 
philipp2020 said:
...= -G (m1 + m2) / r2
on the right side is the gravitational force (kg*m/s^2)
Are you sure? Look up the units of G and check that again.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the reply.

Well usually -G (m1 + m2) / r2 = F = m * a

This is not equal to just acceleration as in a = (dr dv)/(dt dr) = v dv/dr = -G (m1 + m2)
 
philipp2020 said:
Thanks for the reply.

Well usually -G (m1 + m2) / r2 = F = m * a
No. Gravitational force requires two masses multiplied, not added: Gm1m2/r2

The left side of your equation has units of acceleration, not force.
 
aaa, thanks. so silly from me :)
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top