Gravitational Force Vector exerted by 2 charged objects

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the gravitational and electric forces exerted by two charged spheres. The gravitational force on sphere 2 by sphere 1 is determined using the formula Fnet = G * [(m1 * m2)/r^2], resulting in a magnitude of 2.29059829e-16 N. The electric force is calculated using Felec = k * [(q1 * q2)/r^2], yielding a magnitude of 1.84615e-7 N. The participants clarify the relationship between the two forces and the importance of using unit vectors for direction in vector form calculations. Ultimately, the correct approach involves multiplying the magnitudes by the respective unit vectors to express the forces in Cartesian coordinates.
Nal101
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two thin hollow plastic spheres, about the size of a ping-pong ball with masses (m1=m2 = 2e-3 kg) have been rubbed with wool. Sphere 1 has a charge q1 = -4e-9 C and is at location < 40e-2, -20e-2, 0 > m. Sphere 2 has a charge q2 = -6e-9 C and is at location < -50e-2, 40e-2, 0> m

I've already calculated
Relative Position Vector: <-90e-2, 60e-2, 0>
Distance between q1 and q2: 1.0816653 m
Unit Vector: <-.8320502943, .5547001962, 0>
Magnitude of gravitational force exerted on q2 by q1: 2.29059829e-16
The Electrostatic Force between the two objects: 1.84615e-7

Questions:
1) What is the gravitational force (vector) exerted on q2 by q1?
2) What is the electric force (vector) exerted on q2 by q1?


Homework Equations


Fnet = G * [(m1 * m2)/r^2]
Felec = k * [(q1 * q2)/r^2]

The Attempt at a Solution


For question 1, I took each separate component of the unit vector and divided it by the magnitude.
i.e.
<(-.8320502943 / 2.29059829e-16), (.5547001962 / 2.29059829e-16), 0>
For question 2, I didn't know where to start, assuming I needed the answer to question 1.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey there NAl101 :smile:

Why do you think that questions 1 and 2 are related?

You have already written the formula Felec = k * [(q1 * q2)/r^2]
which gives the electrostatic force bewteen two point charges (and I think it is safe to say that we can treat these as point charges).

Perhaps it is the sign of the charges that is troubling you? If so, I would simply treat the formula with their absolute values and then determine the direction by inspection.

That is: F_elec = k*[(|q1||q2|)/r^2]

Direction = "you tell me" :wink:
 
Thanks.

Why do you think that questions 1 and 2 are related?
Actually I do not know, it seems rather absurd at this point in time. I believe though at the time, since I couldn't figure out either one of them, they were seemingly related. I know this to be a false assumption though, seeing as they pertain to different aspects of the system.

The real problem I seem to be having is calculating the answers into a vector form. At first I thought it was simple, and for question 1, divide the unit vector by 2.29059829e-16 (magnitude of grav force) and on the same path, for question 2, divide the unit vector by 1.84615e-7 the electrostatic force between the two objects. This has apparently been disregarded as the correct answer, leaving me with no idea on how to calculate the answers.

Would I be correct in assuming the use of the two formulas towards my answer, having r = the values for x and y in the relative position vectors?
 
Hmm. I am not sure what the convention is here. We always used the "radial unit vector" to denote the direction. So the answer simply had a magnitude of |F_elec|=k*[(|q1||q2|)/r^2] and a direction of r_hat

If you want to write the answer in Cartesian Coordiantes, then you must take the Magnitude of the Vector:

|F_elec|=k*[(|q1||q2|)/r^2]

and then multiply it by the unit vector in the direction of r, which is what I think you are trying to say.

i.e. r_unit = (rxi+ryj)/|r|
 
So.. for problem 2..

1.84615e-7 <-.8320502943, .5547001962, 0>

and problem 1, change the scalar to 2.29059829e-16 ?

Awsome! it worked. Many thanks saladsamurai.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top