Gravitational Forces Question Tricky

XcKyle93
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two planets have masses M and m, and the ratio M/m=25. The distance between the planets is R. The Point P, is between the planets as shown (there is no picture though), and the distance between M and P is x. At P, the gravitational forces on an object due to M and m are equal in magnitude. What is x?

Homework Equations


F = (G*M*m)/R^2

The Attempt at a Solution


I am stumped. Can you really figure this out with the info given? I ended up with some quadratic equation: 0 = 25R^2 - 50Rx + 24x^2
 
Last edited:
on Phys.org
XcKyle93 said:

Homework Statement



Two planets have masses M and m, and the ratio M/m=25. The distance between the planets is R. The Point P, is between the planets as shown (there is no picture though), and the distance between M and P is x. At P, the gravitational forces on an object due to M and m are equal in magnitude. What is x?

Homework Equations


F = (G*M*m)/R

The Attempt at a Solution


I am stumped. Can you really figure this out with the info given? I ended up with some quadratic equation: 0 = 25R^2 - 50Rx + 24x^2

Two things -- your equation that you list is not quite right. And the 2nd "m" in the equation is meant to be the mass of an object a distance R away from a mass M. You will need to have three masses listed in your initial equations (the object's mass will cancel out).
 
XcKyle93 said:
I am stumped. Can you really figure this out with the info given? I ended up with some quadratic equation: 0 = 25R^2 - 50Rx + 24x^2
Stumped? Looks to me like you figured it out just fine. Now just solve the quadratic!
 
I accidentally type the inverse square law incorrectly, but I edited my initial post to fix that. Why would I need three masses if the mass of the object cancels out?
 
Doc Al said:
Stumped? Looks to me like you figured it out just fine. Now just solve the quadratic!

Alright, awesome, I was just unsure of myself. Thanks!
 
XcKyle93 said:
I accidentally type the inverse square law incorrectly, but I edited my initial post to fix that. Why would I need three masses if the mass of the object cancels out?

My point was that M and m are listed in the problem as the masses of the two planets. That doesn't fit the equation that you wrote.
 
Perhaps I should have used slightly different variables for the equation that I wrote down; it was meant to be a general formula.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K