Gravitational Lensing vs Gravitational Microlensing

AI Thread Summary
Gravitational lensing and gravitational microlensing are related but distinct phenomena, primarily differentiated by their scale and the mass of the lensing object. Gravitational lensing encompasses strong, weak, and microlensing categories, each employing different techniques and methodologies. Strong lensing typically involves massive objects like galaxies, while microlensing refers to the effect caused by smaller masses, such as stars. Despite their differences, all forms of lensing utilize the principle of gravitational attraction to bend light. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for studying cosmic structures and phenomena.
sfbsoccer25
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Just a matter of terminology, are gravitational lensing and gravitational microlensing the same phenomenon? I have always been under the impression that they were. Any help? Thanks!
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...

Similar threads

Back
Top