Gravitational Lock in GR: Earth-Venus Positioning

tzimie
Messages
256
Reaction score
27
When 2 bodies are locked over relatively large distances (like locked Earth and Venus), do they lock, naively speaking, to the position where another's body is seen (delay distance/c is taken into account) or to the position where other body is actually at the moment (because of Relativity of simultaneity we have to chose frame here, but there is no problem for slowly moving bodies like Earth and Venus - it could be their center of mass, or Sun, there is a little difference)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What does "like locked Earth and Venus" mean? How are Earth or Venus "locked" in any way? They both orbit the sun.
 
  • Like
Likes bcrowell
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tidal_locking

Venus's 583.92-day interval between successive close approaches to Earth is equal to 5.001444 Venusian solar days, making approximately the same face visible from Earth at each close approach
 
A pure coincidence today. It has been different in the past, it will be different again in the future.
Also, the rotation of planets with a nearly perfect rotational symmetry has no influence on the gravitational force between them.
 
As mfb points out, some cases of celestial bodies being "locked" in this sense is a pure coincidence. However, sometimes it's not a coincidence. For example, the moon always shows the same face to the Earth because of tidal forces.

So you're asking how this notion of "locking", which is well understood in Newtonian physics, is modified by relativity. My guess would be that the relativistic corrections are completely insignificant for any actual planets.
 
  • Like
Likes tzimie
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top