Gravitational potential and kinetic energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the future applications of gravitational potential and kinetic energy. Participants clarify that gravitational potential energy is commonly utilized in various systems, while kinetic energy is typically not categorized as "gravitational." There is a reference to roller coasters as an example of gravitational potential energy in action. The urgency of the inquiry highlights a need for more specific information on future uses. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the ongoing relevance of these energy forms in practical scenarios.
oli_collins
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
does anyone know where i can find out about What the future usage of gravitational potential and kinetic energy is. this is very ergent so if you know can you please write back within the next day.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Future uses? I'm not sure I understand. Gravitational potential energy is used all the time (you wouldn't really describe kinetic energy as "gravitational kinetic energy"). See the roller coaster thread...
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
View full post »

Similar threads

B Can energy be decomposed?
Replies
2
Views
1K
Is there any motion hidden within potential energy?
Replies
7
Views
1K
Why do we add Kinetic and Potential energy?
Replies
3
Views
1K
Understanding the work-kinetic energy theorem
Replies
7
Views
2K
Question About Potential Energy
Replies
3
Views
2K
Conservative forces, Nonconservative forces and Potential Energy
Replies
9
Views
3K
Question about potential energy
Replies
6
Views
2K
I How to interpret this definition of potential energy?
Replies
10
Views
2K
Why is the integrated velocity times change in velocity zero?
Replies
3
Views
1K
I Change of coordinates in a potential energy field
Replies
2
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top