Gravitational potential energy and attraction

AI Thread Summary
Gravitational potential energy arises from the attraction between bodies, and when a small body is placed between two massive bodies, the question of whether to sum or subtract their potential energies is debated. It is clarified that potential energy is a scalar quantity, and while components can be added, they must be defined within a coordinate system where their signs differ. The gravitational potential energy between two masses is expressed mathematically, emphasizing that the potential energy decreases as the small mass approaches the massive bodies. An example is given with the sea's behavior influenced by the moon's gravitational pull, illustrating the concept of effective gravitational field strength. Overall, understanding gravitational potential energy requires careful consideration of the coordinate system and the relative positions of the masses involved.
harini_5
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Gravitational potential energy usually arises due to the force of attraction experienced by a body. When a small body is placed between to massive bodies (not of equal masses) it is attracted by both. So when we consider the small body’s gravitational potential energy should we take the sum of the potential energies due to the two massive bodies or their difference? I get this question because the forces of attraction on the small body are in the opposite directions
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Potential energy is a scalar, so you just add them.
 
Hang on, P.E is the work done against the gravitational field to take your test particle there against the field, once you choose your coordinates the other mass is working against the Gravitational field, hence you subtract them not add them.

In a sense you are right - you do "add them", however only once you've carefully defined your coordinate system such that the P.E components from each will be of different signs.

The sea on the Earth is a perfect example of this. when the moon gets close to it its gravitational P.E decreases, hence it rises (less effective pull from the earth).

Please someone correct me if I'm wrong.
 
jbunten said:
Hang on, P.E is the work done against the gravitational field to take your test particle there against the field, once you choose your coordinates the other mass is working against the Gravitational field, hence you subtract them not add them.

In a sense you are right - you do "add them", however only once you've carefully defined your coordinate system such that the P.E components from each will be of different signs.
The gravitational PE between two masses is given by:

{PE} = - \frac{Gm_1 m_2}{r}

Where r is the distance between them. (Note that when they are infinitely far apart the PE is taken to be 0.)

If you have two massive bodies, M1 & M2, the change in PE of the system when you bring a small mass close to them is:

{PE} = (-\frac{GM_1 m}{r_1}) + (-\frac{GM_2 m}{r_2})

The sea on the Earth is a perfect example of this. when the moon gets close to it its gravitational P.E decreases, hence it rises (less effective pull from the earth).
The reason for the rising of the sea is the difference in the moon's gravitational field strength acting on the sea compared to the earth.
 
I've thought about it and you're right, energy is a scalar and position does not come into it, the test particle being between the two massive objects is just a special case of the more general. Thanks for the clarification
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top