Gravitational Potential Energy of a rocket fired straight up

AI Thread Summary
A rocket fired straight up at half the escape velocity will reach a maximum height determined by gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy equations. The initial kinetic energy is given by 1/2mv^2, while the potential energy at the surface is -GMm/R. As the rocket ascends, its kinetic energy decreases to zero at the peak height, where the potential energy is -GMm/(R + h). To find the maximum height, one must equate the initial total energy to the potential energy at the peak. The discussion emphasizes the relationship between initial velocity and height, highlighting the need to apply gravitational equations correctly.
genPhysics
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A rocket is fired straight up from the surface of the Earth at half the escape velocity. How high will it go relative to the surface of the earth?
Neglect dissipative forces.


Homework Equations



Uinitial + Kinitial = Uf

Kf is zero

G*m*M/radius^2 + 1/2mv^2 = -G*m*M/(2R)

The Attempt at a Solution



I used the above equations and I can solve for the initial velocity. I am stuck on how to find the height. Is it just 2R?

Many thanks...physics is a struggle for me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
On the surface of the earth, PE = -GMm/R and KE = 1/2*m*v^2
At a certain height, KE = 0, and PE = -GMm/(R + h)
What is the expression for the escape velocity?
From that find the initial velocity.
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Variation of escape velocity with equal surface gravity
Replies
7
Views
1K
Where in orbit should a rocket fire to escape with minimum ΔV
Replies
17
Views
2K
Misunderstanding of Gravitational Potential Energy
Replies
7
Views
3K
Gravitational potential energy traveling from earth to mars
Replies
7
Views
3K
Gravitational Potential Energy questions near the surface of a planet
Replies
8
Views
2K
Conservation of Energy with Gravitational Potential Energy
Replies
6
Views
2K
A rocket on a spring, related to potential/kinetic energy
Replies
3
Views
2K
Question about gravitational potential energy and angular motion
Replies
4
Views
1K
Deriving gravitational potential energy -- mistake
Replies
9
Views
2K
Calculating Gravitational Potential
Replies
3
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top