Gravitational potential energy of a system

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the gravitational potential energy of a system of eight 10 kg masses at the corners of a cube with a side length of 0.25 meters, the formula U = -G*m1*m2/r is used. The approach involves calculating the potential energy for each pair of masses, but the challenge lies in efficiently summing the contributions from all pairs. A suggested method is to remove one mass at a time and calculate the work required to bring the remaining masses from infinity to their positions. Although this process can be tedious, recognizing patterns in the calculations can simplify the task. Ultimately, understanding the gravitational interactions between all masses is essential for accurately determining the system's potential energy.
roshan2004
Messages
140
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What is the gravitational potential energy of a system of 8 masses of 10 kg each placed at the corners of a cube of length 0.25 meter apart.



Homework Equations


U=-G*m1*m2/r


The Attempt at a Solution


I have actually taken one particle pair at a time and sum all of their potential energy, but the answer is not quite right.
 

Attachments

  • potential.jpg
    potential.jpg
    18.1 KB · Views: 523
Physics news on Phys.org
You just want to find the work needed to remove all the masses to infinity.
So pick one ... remove it: how much work would that take?

OK so now you have 5 masses - pick one, remove it: how much work did that take?

Rinse and repeat.
 
I think there are 8 masses in here.
 
Good - you are paying attention ;)
How would you have to change the suggestion to account for the different number of masses?
 
I think it will be very tiresome to pick each and every particle and work out their work done in bringing them from infinity to that position. There must be some quick method...
 
Yes and no - there is no getting around having to do this for every particle.
But you only have 8 steps to do, and, once you get started, you should notice a pattern that makes things easier.

Finding this out is a big part of why the exercize is set in the first place.
There is no Royal road to knowledge.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top