Gravitational Potential Energy Problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the gravitational potential energy of a simple pendulum at a 30° angle from the vertical. The formula used is U = mgh, with h derived from the pendulum's length L and the angle. However, the initial calculation of h as Lcos30° is incorrect because it does not account for the correct reference height. Participants suggest drawing a diagram to visualize the pendulum's positions and clarify the change in height. Correctly identifying the height difference is crucial for accurately determining the gravitational potential energy.
marc_2094
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A simple pendulum is swinging. Its mass is m and its length is L. What is its gravitational potential energy if it is oriented at 30° with respect to the vertical? (Let gravitational potential energy be zero if it is in the vertical orientation).


Homework Equations


U = mgh


The Attempt at a Solution


Given mass = m and length = L, the only thing left is to solve for h. Since it is oriented 30° wrt vertical, then h = Lcos30°. So U = mgLcos30°

But it's not the answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
marc_2094 said:

Homework Statement


A simple pendulum is swinging. Its mass is m and its length is L. What is its gravitational potential energy if it is oriented at 30° with respect to the vertical? (Let gravitational potential energy be zero if it is in the vertical orientation).


Homework Equations


U = mgh


The Attempt at a Solution


Given mass = m and length = L, the only thing left is to solve for h. Since it is oriented 30° wrt vertical, then h = Lcos30°. So U = mgLcos30°

But it's not the answer.

Hi marc_2094, Welcome to Physics Forums.

Did you draw a diagram showing the pendulum in both orientations? Pay close attention to the location of the line segment that represents the difference in height.
 
This is my diagram. Is it correct?
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    1.8 KB · Views: 417
marc_2094 said:
This is my diagram. Is it correct?

I don't see the original height (zero reference point for the gravitational potential) indicated, or the line segment representing the change in height.

Mark the original position of the pendulum bob and its new position (at 30°). Is the change in height equal to the length of the triangle leg as you've shown?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top