Gravitational Potential Energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the gravitational self potential energy of a solid ball with a given mass density and radius. The initial attempt incorrectly applies the formula for gravitational potential energy in relation to height above the ground, leading to confusion about the correct interpretation of the problem. It clarifies that the question pertains to the self-gravity of the ball, not its position relative to the Earth. The correct approach involves understanding that the self potential energy is negative and relates to the energy required to disassemble the ball. Ultimately, the realization of misinterpretation highlights the complexity of the problem.
IgE
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The gravitational self potential energy of a solid energy of a solid ball of mass density p and radius R is E. What is the gravitational self potential energy of a ball of mass density p and radius 2R?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


The gravitational potential energy is given by the equation "mgh=U" where the mass relevant is the center of mass. Since it is a sphere with uniform density, the CM is in the center. This puts the CM of the first ball R above the ground and the second ball 2R above the ground. As for mass the second ball is heavier. Mass2/mass1= ((4/3 pi (r) cubed) p)/((4/3 pi (2 R) cubed) p) which tells me that ball 2 is 8 times heavier. Since g does not change the U of the second ball should be 8 times 2 which is 16 E. However the answer is 32 E. This question is hard. ahah Thanks! =)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
IgE said:

Homework Statement


The gravitational self potential energy of a solid energy of a solid ball of mass density p and radius R is E. What is the gravitational self potential energy of a ball of mass density p and radius 2R?

The Attempt at a Solution


The gravitational potential energy is given by the equation "mgh=U" where the mass relevant is the center of mass. Since it is a sphere with uniform density, the CM is in the center. This puts the CM of the first ball R above the ground and the second ball 2R above the ground. As for mass the second ball is heavier. Mass2/mass1= ((4/3 pi (r) cubed) p)/((4/3 pi (2 R) cubed) p) which tells me that ball 2 is 8 times heavier. Since g does not change the U of the second ball should be 8 times 2 which is 16 E. However the answer is 32 E. This question is hard. ahah Thanks! =)
Hello IgE. Welcome to PF.

I'm quite sure that you have totally misinterpreted the question.

It is asking for the gravitational self potential energy. This is not a ball on the earth. You are not being asked the potential energy of a ball, in the vicinity of earth, whose center of mass is a distance of R from the ground.

This is a ball of density ρ which is being held together by its own self gravity. Since gravity is an attractive force, I suspect that the self potential energy is negative.

How much energy will it take to disassemble this ball, moving each bit of its mass infinitely far away from all the rest of its mass?
 
That gives me the right answer now! Yayy!Oh man, I spent two hours on this problem solving it in so many different ways only realize i had the problem misinterpreted. This is hard medicine to digest ahhahah. Thank you so much!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top