Gravitational Potential (problems with definition)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion regarding the sign convention in the definition of gravitational potential. It highlights that gravitational force is conservative, meaning the work done is related to changes in potential energy. The potential energy is defined as the work required to move a mass from infinity to a point P, which should yield a negative value for potential. The error arises from misunderstanding that potential energy is the negative of the work done by gravity. Clarification emphasizes that potential energy reflects the work done by gravity when moving from point P to infinity.
Cozy_Powell
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I tried to get the potential from the potential energy and I get a positive sign for potential...! I cannot find what I did wrong.
- Gravitational force is conservative so its work W is symmetrical to the change in potential energy U.
- Potential is the work done by gravitational force, per unit mass, to bring a mass from infinity to a certain point P.

Initial position of mass: ∞
Final position of mass: point P

W = - ΔU
W = - (Up - U)
W = - (-GMm/rp - (-GMm/r))
W = - (-GMm/r + 0)
W = GMm/r
W/m = GM/r

Potential = φ = W/m = GM/r

It should be negative...

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The definition you used has the wrong sign convention. Potential energy is the work that must be done by you to bring a mass from infinity to a certain point P. It is the negative of the work done by gravity during that same process.

Equivalently, potential energy can be taken as the work that would be done by gravity as a mass moves from point P to infinity.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top