Gravitational potential using spherical harmonics (WGS84)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating Earth's gravitational potential using spherical harmonics based on the WGS84 model. The formula for gravitational potential, V, includes variables such as GM (Earth's gravitational constant), r (distance from the Earth's center), and a (semi-major axis of the WGS84 ellipsoid). A user, Ryan, seeks clarification on the definition of "d" in the context of derivatives used in the formula. Another participant clarifies that "d" refers to derivatives, which resolves Ryan's confusion. The exchange highlights the importance of understanding mathematical notation in gravitational potential calculations.
ryan88
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am looking to use the definition from WGS84 to calculate Earth's gravitational potential using spherical harmonics, however I am having some difficulty finding the definition of one of the variables. Gravitational potential is given as the following:

V = \frac{GM}{r}\left [ 1 + \sum_{n=2}^{n_{max}} \sum_{m=0}^{n} \left( \frac{a}{r} \right )^n \bar{P}_{nm} \left( \sin{\phi} \right ) \left( \bar{C}_{nm} \cos{m\lambda} + \bar{S}_{nm} \sin{m\lambda} \right ) \right ]

where:

V is the gravitational potential function
GM is the Earth's gravitational constant
r is the distance from the Earth's centre of mass
a is the semi-major axis of the WGS84 ellipsoid
n,m are the degree and order respectively
\phi is the geocentric latitude
\lambda is the longitude
\bar{C}_{nm},\bar{S}_{nm} are normalised gravitational coefficients

\bar{P}_{nm}\left( \sin \phi \right) = \left[ \frac{(n-m)!(2n+1)k}{(n+m)!} \right] P_{nm}(\sin\phi)

P_{nm}(\sin\phi) = (\cos\phi)^m \frac{d^m}{d(\sin\phi)^m}[P_n(\sin\phi)]

P_n(\sin\phi) = \frac{1}{2^n n!} \frac{d^n}{d(\sin\phi)^n}\left( \sin^2\phi -1 \right )^n

m=0,k=1
m\ne0,k=2

However, I can't find what the definition of d is. Can anyone offer any help?

Thanks,

Ryan
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It means derivative. As in d/dt, d^2/dt^2, etc
 
Ah right, now I feel stupid, lol.

Thanks for that,

Ryan
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top