Gravitational Wave Discovery & Einsteinian Gravity: What's the Connection?

JerryF
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
Hi Everyone, my first post here.

I'm really confused by the comments around the recent LIGO gravitational waves discovery and how it connects to Einsteins gravitational model. My understanding is that he said a body warped spacetime around it forming a gravitational well into which other bodies would 'fall into'. This relies entirely on the topography of spacetime with no force carrying particles or waves needed for this model.

Can anyone explain please?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gravitons are hypothetical particles that appear in some unconfirmed quantum mechanical theories of gravity. They are no part of general relativity (Einstein's theory of gravity) so they are neither required nor precluded by it.

Gravitational waves aren't required by general relativity either - it's the other way around. You write down the equations of general relativity (the Einstein Field Equations), you solve them, and under certain conditions one of the solutions is gravitational waves.
 
  • Like
Likes JerryF
Thanks Nugatory. Having no higher maths at all I won't be solving any of those equations soon. Could you point me to anywhere where I could read an abstract of the conditions and/or solutions you mention?

Thanks. :smile:
 
Thanks very much Drakkith.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...

Similar threads

Back
Top