Gravitational Wave Observatories: Testing & Feasibility

gildomar
Messages
98
Reaction score
2
This may be a stupid question, but have the various gravitational wave observatories around the world been tested by seeing if they can detect man-made gravitational waves, and thus work as expected? Or would it be too unfeasible to make them, even given the extreme sensitivity that the detectors have already demonstrated?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The detectors look for gravitational waves from astrophysical sources. Gravitational waves generated by non-self-gravitating sources like humans are fantastically small in amplitude so there's no point in even trying to detect them. You need extremely powerful astrophysical events to produce gravitational waves that have even a hopelessly small chance of being detected. Recently a more fruitful venue of gravitational wave detection comes from inflation.
 
gildomar said:
Or would it be too unfeasible to make them, even given the extreme sensitivity that the detectors have already demonstrated?

Yes. In order to make gravitational waves that we would have a chance of detecting, we would have to be able to wiggle around planet-sized, or at least asteroid-sized, masses however we pleased. The gravitational waves that would be produced by wiggling around even the largest masses we could possibly control are way too weak for our detectors to detect.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top