Gravitational wave propagation in GR - follow up

  • #31
PeterDonis said:
The subspace of the tangent space that Wald refers to is a vector space in its own right.
Yes. The point is that we have a tensor field (the metric tensor field ##g_{ab}##) and a timelike congruence ##\xi^a##. The latter, evaluated at each point, allows us to split both tangent and cotangent space at that point in a direct sum. This decomposition extends to all sort of their tensor products. Then we can split fiberwise the twice covariant tensor bundle which ##g_{}## is element of. This construction allows us to define the relevant projection ##h_{ab} = g_{ab} + u_au_b## of the tensor field ##g_{ab}##.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
cianfa72 said:
This construction allows us to define the relevant projection ##h_{ab} = g_{ab} + u_au_b## of the tensor field ##g_{ab}##.
I don't see why you need "this construction" to do that. All you're doing is taking a linear combination of tensor fields in the tangent space. You already know you can do that for any tensor fields; you don't need any additional "construction" to make it possible.
 
  • #33
PeterDonis said:
You already know you can do that for any tensor fields; you don't need any additional "construction" to make it possible.
The point I was trying to make is technical. The set of smooth tensor fields of a given type on the smooth manifold M isn't a vector space, rather a module over the ring of ##C^{\infty}(M)## functions. So technically ##h_{ab}\xi^a = 0## holds fiberwise. Then one extends this to the tensor fields themselves.
 
  • #34
cianfa72 said:
The set of smooth tensor fields of a given type on the smooth manifold M isn't a vector space
Again I'm not sure what you mean. The tangent space at each point of a smooth manifold is a vector space, and that is the vector space in which tensor equations like ##h_{ab} = g_{ab} + u_a u_b## and ##h_{ab} \xi^a = 0## are written. Note that the tangent space itself includes sufficient structure to define covariant derivatives, which are tensor operators. So every equation which is relevant in GR is a tensor equation in the tangent space.

I think you need to find an actual GR reference (textbook or peer-reviewed paper), or at least a differential geometry reference, that expounds whatever point you think you are trying to make.
 
  • #35
pervect said:
this projection operator I've discussed above is not ##h_{ab}##, or even ##h^a{}_b##.
In which case I don't see its relevance to what we're discussing in this thread.

pervect said:
I suppose ##h^a{}_b## lives in the tangent space
Of course it does. All tensors live in the tangent space.

pervect said:
it maps a vector in the tangent space at some point p to another vector that is orthogonal to the congruence at point p.
That's what ##h^a{}_b## does, yes. The only clarification I would make is that "the congruence at point p" is a particular vector ##\xi^a## in the tangent space, the one that is tangent at p to the worldline in the congruence that passes through p. The orthogonality property is then simply ##h^a{}_b \xi^b = 0##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K